Re: Cool Web Search "Shredder" Update 03/12/03
From: Mad Max (madmax1300REMOVETHIS_at_REMOVETHISmail.com)
Date: 12/04/03
- Next message: Mad Max: "Re: Cool Web Search "Shredder" Update 03/12/03"
- Previous message: valid: "Re: How Effective Are Firewalls and Anti Virus Applications"
- In reply to: john: "Re: Cool Web Search "Shredder" Update 03/12/03"
- Next in thread: John John: "Re: Cool Web Search "Shredder" Update 03/12/03"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 23:54:26 -0600
Dear john:
You have not made me look stupid. Instead it is you that is stupid.
I am simply ignorant. I do not know everything , as you obviously do. I have
a lot to learn, as you obviously do not have anything to learn. It must be
wonderful to be so perfect.
Why am I posting to so many NGs ? I beg your forgiveness, I did not know
your permission is required to post anywhere, any time I please. I will make
a note of that and refer to it from time to time.
I suppose you are correct , I did click on things. I tried to X my way out
of them all. I used ctl/alt/del. and I admit , if you will allow, that I did
pull the plug out of the wall.
You are correct I have not used Popup Stopper Pro. I also do not buy several
hundred/thousand other things that you most likely have. Should I start
buying immediately ? Why don't you send me a list of everything I just must
have ,in order to comply with your instructions. I will put that list beside
the note with your permission to post on the places you consider me worthy
to do so.
A question comes to mind. Why would you waste your time bantering with
someone you obviously consider to be mentally inferior to yourself ? Or
maybe you are not as smart as you perceive yourself to be. Dare I say that
is a FACT !
"john" <john_f@bigpond.net.a> wrote in message
news:Z%yzb.38684$aT.20249@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> I have gradually arrived at the conclusion that you have absolutely no
idea
> what you're talking about.
> BTW, why are you posting to so many NGs?
>
> I will try once more.
>
> No, you can't blame Google. It is purely a search engine and just looks
for
> a word or words that match your query.
> It's obvious you haven't spent much time meditating on this, or even
> bothering to explore Google's options.
>
> If you had, and clicked on Advanced Search, you would have seen a little
box
> that says "Filter using Safe Search." Did you check that box?
> Obviously not, as that eliminates most porn links. Aw, gee, now I've made
> you look stupid.
>
> You also said you used Popup Stopper. Did I say that? No. I said Popup
> Stopper Pro (which resides on IE Taskbar, complete with over-riding
> options). Try reading thoroughly next time before you reply.
> I'm glad to see you weren't impressed, but curious as to why you didn't
> bother to expand on which aspects didn't impress you.
> Oh, I forgot. You haven't bothered to try Popup Stopper Pro.
>
> And once again, read before replying & don't try to put words in my mouth.
> If you bother to read again, you will note that I didn't say anything
about
> INTENTIONALLY downloading in order to become infected.
> I did say "you would HAVE HAD TO click on SOMETHING to cause it to
download.
> And that's not an opinion - that's a FACT.
>
> --
> John
>
> > John:
> > Possibly you need to read my message again. I simply asked Google to
> > find tutorials for Windows XP. I know exactly what happened after that.
> > You're saying that Google cannot be blamed , because I should have
> > specified that I did not want any viruses, any Trojan Horses , or any
> > Home page Hijackers included . I see.
> > Lets say I did specify that. Would Google then be to blame ?
> > Couldn't really follow your rant because it was mixed in with
> > Hillbillies and mine. But, I have used Popup Stopper, for a short time
> > and was not impressed. The cure was worse than the disease.
> > To clear up one thing-- at the time I became so infected I was not
> > using as many prevention tools as now.
> > Concerning what you want to call " my logic " exactly what was the
> > point you were trying to make ? Possibly that you too hold the opinion
> > that a virus must be intentionally downloaded in order to become
> > infected ?
> > Your statement that " Google has no problem" . Would you care to revise
> > that ? Oh, I forgot. Google bears no responsibility for providing . It
> > must then be totally the fault of anyone taking their advice. I
> > suppose you use that same logic when you give advice.
> > Reminds me of a credit checking bureau that defamed me. They also took
> > no responsibility for their report, even though the report had numerous
> > errors and even a blind man could see that I was not the individual in
> > question. Only the names were the same, nothing else.
> > My lawyer convinced them that they did have legal responsibility and I
> > had legal recourse .The report was quickly revised.
> > Must be a full moon tonight.
> >
> > MAD MAX
> > "john" <john_f@bigpond.net.a> wrote in message
> > news:iJvzb.38406$aT.27606@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> >>> HillBillly:
> >>> Stick this in your corncob pipe and smoke it. Do not judge , lest ye
> >>> be judged. Like so many claiming to be what your handle claims, you
> >>> are narrow minded , judgmental and about as far as one that claims to
> >>> be a Christian ,can be. Don't flaunt it if you aint got it.
> >>> For your uninformed information --I did nothing to bring those
> >>> problems upon myself. You simply have a canned answer for what ever
> >>> you are too uninformed to understand.
> >>
> >>
> >>> I went to Google looking for a tutorial on my new XP machine. After
> >> locating several likely sites on Google that claimed to be tutorials ,
> >> I was taken to a porno site. Trying to work my way out only resulted
> >> in my being taken to one porno site after another. I did not download
> >> anything , did not click on anything and did not moon the hillbillies.
> >>> Get your facts straight before you start making wild accusations . I
> > would
> >> also note that this is not the first time I have witnessed you do just
> >> that to numerous others. And by the way , you can climb off me just as
> >> you climbed on. Either that , or you know what you can kiss.
> >>> I understand the problem that Google has, its the same as we all have
> >>> ,
> >> and there is little or nothing we can do about it, for now.
> >>
> >> Rubbish! Google has no problem, it's the link Google found based on
> >> YOUR search criterea and which you elected to access.
> >> Install Pop-up Stopper Pro, then you won't get into the endless loop of
> >> multiplying porn pages - simply shut the first one down.
> >>
> >> "wild accusations, unfounded condemnations and uninformed rhetoric"
> >> applies more to your form of 'logic'
> >>
> >> john
> >>
> >>> That said, your wild accusations, unfounded condemnations and
> >>> uninformed rhetoric do not help anyone. If indeed that is why you so
> >>> often offer useless advice.
> >>>
> >>> MAD MAX
> >>>
> >>> "HillBillyBuddhist" <hillbillybuddhist@shoescolumbus.rr.com> wrote in
> >>> message news:e2JEt0euDHA.2432@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >>>> "Mad Max" <madmax1300REMOVETHIS@REMOVETHISmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>> news:Ojay3keuDHA.1760@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >>>>> "john":
> >>>>> No wonder you need CW Shredder, you've been to Google.
> >>>>> My last visit to Google netted me two viruses , a Trojan Horse and a
> >>>>> Homepage Hijacker, not to mention assorted adware crapola.
> >>>>
> >>>> For the record visiting Google did not infect your or anyone else's
> >>>> computers. Foolish and unsafe computing practices following a visit
> >>>> to Google may well have. The result and ramifications of such
> >>>> practices lie solely on the head of the user and have nothing
> >>>> whatsoever to do with having visited Google.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> D
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm not an MVP a VIP nor do I have ESP.
> >>>> I was just trying to help.
> >>>> Please use your own best judgment before implementing any suggestions
> >>>> or advice herein.
> >>>> No warranty is expressed or implied.
> >>>> Your mileage may vary.
> >>>> See store for details. :)
> >>>>
> >>>> Remove shoes to E-mail.
>
>
- Next message: Mad Max: "Re: Cool Web Search "Shredder" Update 03/12/03"
- Previous message: valid: "Re: How Effective Are Firewalls and Anti Virus Applications"
- In reply to: john: "Re: Cool Web Search "Shredder" Update 03/12/03"
- Next in thread: John John: "Re: Cool Web Search "Shredder" Update 03/12/03"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
