Re: Anti-Virus Softwar - Mcafee 8.0 vs. Norton 2004
From: Mike Hall (mike.hall.mail_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: 10/08/03
- Next message: Bill Sanderson: "Re: Security for Windows 95"
- Previous message: Oli Restorick [MVP]: "Re: 2 redundant 2000 servers"
- In reply to: Keith: "Anti-Virus Softwar - Mcafee 8.0 vs. Norton 2004"
- Next in thread: Jim Waldron: "Re: Anti-Virus Softwar - Mcafee 8.0 vs. Norton 2004"
- Reply: Jim Waldron: "Re: Anti-Virus Softwar - Mcafee 8.0 vs. Norton 2004"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 18:53:20 -0400
Norton sucks.. Use McAfee.. I believe that in some countries, firewall comes
with it..
-- History is only the past if we choose to do nothing about it.. "Keith" <Keithcpd@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:078d01c38d1f$3462d220$a101280a@phx.gbl... > I am pretty new to the computer world and have a question > regarding these programs. I currently have Mcafee 6.0 > and the more I have started to read and "get into this > computer/internet world" the more I see I have to > upgrade. > Any recomendations between the two. On Amazon.com, in > the review section, many people have said that Norton > slows the computer quite a bit. > One other thing I've seen, Norton internet security comes > with a firewall, Mcafee sells the firewall seperately. > Thanks in advance.
- Next message: Bill Sanderson: "Re: Security for Windows 95"
- Previous message: Oli Restorick [MVP]: "Re: 2 redundant 2000 servers"
- In reply to: Keith: "Anti-Virus Softwar - Mcafee 8.0 vs. Norton 2004"
- Next in thread: Jim Waldron: "Re: Anti-Virus Softwar - Mcafee 8.0 vs. Norton 2004"
- Reply: Jim Waldron: "Re: Anti-Virus Softwar - Mcafee 8.0 vs. Norton 2004"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|