Re: is it necessary to install MS03-039 if MS03-026 is already installed?
From: adfreak (rtivnan_at_comcast.net)
Date: 09/10/03
- Next message: Bill Sanderson: "Re: Windows 2000 SP4 affected?"
- Previous message: xp slave: "Re: Odd"
- In reply to: Del Capslock: "Re: is it necessary to install MS03-039 if MS03-026 is already installed?"
- Next in thread: Torgeir Bakken (MVP): "Re: is it necessary to install MS03-039 if MS03-026 is already installed?"
- Reply: Torgeir Bakken (MVP): "Re: is it necessary to install MS03-039 if MS03-026 is already installed?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 16:06:25 -0400
let me reverse the question. What if we have not installed MS03-026 on some
machines? Do we need to do that first prior to installing MS03-039?
"Del Capslock" <del @ caps.lock.net> wrote in message
news:8oqulv05tus3v466at0mv6b8f9lm86sadn@4ax.com...
> YES!
>
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:06:18 -0700, "Greg Brown" <greg@socal.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Is it necessary to install MS03-039 if I already installed MS03-026?
> >
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Greg
> >
>
- Next message: Bill Sanderson: "Re: Windows 2000 SP4 affected?"
- Previous message: xp slave: "Re: Odd"
- In reply to: Del Capslock: "Re: is it necessary to install MS03-039 if MS03-026 is already installed?"
- Next in thread: Torgeir Bakken (MVP): "Re: is it necessary to install MS03-039 if MS03-026 is already installed?"
- Reply: Torgeir Bakken (MVP): "Re: is it necessary to install MS03-039 if MS03-026 is already installed?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|