Re: anti-abuse privacy??
From: Sandi - Microsoft MVP (sandi_hardmeier_at_mvps.org)
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 14:20:59 +0800
Your situation is why I have a very strong DISLIKE of Norton and McAfee.
"BugBear" arrives an attachment, or can be embedded in an email message.
If you are using Internet Explorer 5.01SP2 or IE6 you are NOT affected by
the vulnerability which allows your machine to be infected just by
previewing the message. The vulnerability is described here:
I do not understand why Norton is trying to force you to download a cleaner.
Your version of OE is not affected by the 'auto-run' vulnerability,
therefore if you do not run the attachment (and why would you when you've
been told its a virus) you do not have a problem and do NOT need to run a
cleaner. To be absolutely certain, set OE to view all messages as 'plain
text' and there is no way for any script to execute when you view a message
in the preview pane.
-- Hyperlinks are used to ensure answers remain current. ________________________________________ Sandi Hardmeier - Microsoft MVP since 1999 http://www.mvps.org/inetexplorer "Val Brown" <email@example.com> wrote in message news:uUl5ZHuMDHA.firstname.lastname@example.org... > I joined in on somebody elses question about viruses in the last few days > but didn't get an answer to my last question. That is why I am posting it > as an original question with hopes of getting an answer. > > In the last few days I have been getting a few viruses coming in my > Outlook > Express email. Norton is catching them but "bugbear" you had to > quarantine > and then download the tool to fix it. I did that but I am pretty > concerned > now about it. I lost my last computer to the Klez and they say bugbear is > a > relative. I have a few months old Dell Dimension P4 with Windows XP and > I > would like to keep it going for a couple of years. > > > Yesterday I bought McAfee Spam Killer and in its control center it gives > me a 10 for antihacker, 10 for antivirus and 10 for anti spam and a 1 for > antiabuse privacy as I don't have anything for that apparently. Does > anyone > have advice for me on that one. Should I definitely be protected there. > > Thanks. > >