Re: Digital ID, encryption to help prevent e-mail dissemination by worm ?
From: Michel Gallant (neutron_at_istar.ca)
Date: 06/13/03
- Next message: Michel Gallant: "Re: try to load signed dll on ie and still prompts for unsafe"
- Previous message: B. Goodman: "Re: Removing old members from..."
- In reply to: Vizvary Istvan III: "Re: Digital ID, encryption to help prevent e-mail dissemination by worm ?"
- Next in thread: Mel Ruttan: "Re: Digital ID, encryption to help prevent e-mail dissemination by worm ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 10:19:56 -0400
"Vizvary Istvan III" <vizyp@ppuvas.com.pl> wrote in message
news:egzXXhYMDHA.1968@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>
> This is because encrypted content is not any safer than plain content
> when all the secrets are easily accessible. That is why credentials
> protection
> must be a part of a security policy. And security policy is what this
> thread is really about.
>
Only partly, if you read the OP, second question:
"Also, I have heard from many people that digital ID, signature and
encryption are considered cumbersome these days. I'd appreciate if you could
advise on how effective confidential e-mails could be handled these days."
- Mitch
- Next message: Michel Gallant: "Re: try to load signed dll on ie and still prompts for unsafe"
- Previous message: B. Goodman: "Re: Removing old members from..."
- In reply to: Vizvary Istvan III: "Re: Digital ID, encryption to help prevent e-mail dissemination by worm ?"
- Next in thread: Mel Ruttan: "Re: Digital ID, encryption to help prevent e-mail dissemination by worm ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
