Re: Speaking of FTP...
From: Motherchucker (charles@NOSPAM.charleswjones.com)
Date: 04/01/03
- Next message: x y, mvp: "Re: Speaking of FTP..."
- Previous message: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]: "Re: VPN vs. Cisco LEAP for wireless security ?"
- In reply to: Daniel Billingsley: "Speaking of FTP..."
- Next in thread: x y, mvp: "Re: Speaking of FTP..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Motherchucker" <charles@NOSPAM.charleswjones.com> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:02:24 -0600
"Daniel Billingsley" <dbillingsley@NO.durcon.SPAAMM.com> wrote in message
news:unqNelH#CHA.2072@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> I have heard it mentioned several times that FTP is inherently prone to
> security problems. Our current ISP doesn't even allow it all for this
> reason.
>
> But they allow WebDAV (FrontPage) modifications.
>
> What is it about FTP (asuming it's not anonymous access - duh) that makes
it
> so insecure, especially as compared to FrontPage extensions?
>
>
Nothing is wrong with FTP... people just don't know how to set it up
correctly.
Charles
- Next message: x y, mvp: "Re: Speaking of FTP..."
- Previous message: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]: "Re: VPN vs. Cisco LEAP for wireless security ?"
- In reply to: Daniel Billingsley: "Speaking of FTP..."
- Next in thread: x y, mvp: "Re: Speaking of FTP..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|