Re: 128 bit encryption
From: Rick (revrick@redrivernet.com)
Date: 02/03/03
- Next message: Heiko Steinweg: "Re: email about Microsoft paying money?????"
- Previous message: Curtis Anderson: "Re: Owners Who Steal Yahoo Accounts"
- In reply to: Kent Shaw: "Re: 128 bit encryption"
- Next in thread: Bill Sanderson: "Re: 128 bit encryption"
- Reply: Bill Sanderson: "Re: 128 bit encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Rick" <revrick@redrivernet.com> Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 22:35:09 -0800
The reason for no 6.0 is because I am not real adept at
installing things. When I downloaded ie5.5 it really
messed my computer up. I have a lot of church files in
here and I am afraid of losing something. Thanks for the
suggestion though..Rick
>-----Original Message-----
>Just curious, why not ie 6.0 sp1? It has 128 bit
encyption (at least
>US versions).
>
>
>On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 19:09:49 -0800, "Rick"
<revrick@redrivernet.com>
>wrote:
>
>>I am running IE 5.0 with windows 98. I dowloaded file
>>ie5dom.exe to upgrade to 128 bit encryption. Whenever I
>>try to install the file, a message pops up that
says "This
>>package requires Internet Explorer 5.0 or Windows NT 4.0
>>with Service Pack 4 or 5 instalation cancelled".
>>Consequently it will not upgrade to 128 bit. What does
it
>>mean when it says "with Service Pack 4 or 5 instalation
>>cancelled" ?? Please help me, as I need to have 128 bit
>>encryption to access some of the government sites such
as
>>Social Security. Thanks in advance for any help you can
>>give me. Rick
>
>.
>
- Next message: Heiko Steinweg: "Re: email about Microsoft paying money?????"
- Previous message: Curtis Anderson: "Re: Owners Who Steal Yahoo Accounts"
- In reply to: Kent Shaw: "Re: 128 bit encryption"
- Next in thread: Bill Sanderson: "Re: 128 bit encryption"
- Reply: Bill Sanderson: "Re: 128 bit encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|