Re: Is it really true that NTFS is secure?
From: B. Goodman (no@spam.org)
Date: 12/16/02
- Next message: Alun Jones: "Re: EvidenceEliminator"
- Previous message: Strickland: "Win2k Security Groups"
- In reply to: George Hester: "Re: Is it really true that NTFS is secure?"
- Next in thread: George Hester: "Re: Is it really true that NTFS is secure?"
- Reply: George Hester: "Re: Is it really true that NTFS is secure?"
- Reply: George Hester: "Re: Is it really true that NTFS is secure?"
- Reply: George Hester: "Re: Is it really true that NTFS is secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: B. Goodman <no@spam.org> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:44:37 -0500
In article <u5dL92toCHA.1888@TK2MSFTNGP09>, hesterloli@hotmail.com
says...
> "Lock Forever" How? I see it in minutes. Forever is quite a few =
> minutes. This also looks like lockout will be true for all Accounts.
>
> OK the rest of what you suggested I am in the process of doing or have =
> done. Your first suggestion has me scrattching my head. Not sure other =
> then in Group Policy what you are suggesting as I cannot find this =
> lockout policy that is specific to an account nor the "forever" idea.
>
> --=20
> George Hester
> __________________________________
> "B. Goodman" <no@spam.org> wrote in message =
> news:MPG.1863b75bd793e1759896d2@msnews.microsoft.com...
> > In article <ufXDRfmoCHA.2424@TK2MSFTNGP12>, hesterloli@hotmail.com=20
> > says...
> > > Please understand that my machine comes up empty handed on all AV =
> scans =3D
> > > and trojans. I need to find some way of watching when this Group =
> Policy =3D
> > > change happens. Like a log. That tells me the time that it happend =
> or =3D
> > > the responsible party. It doesn't show in Event Viewer.
> > >=20
> > > You know I ran a server W2K prior to this and never had this issue. =
> =3D
> > > Started on Prof full time now and I am battling security it seems =
> every =3D
> > > hour.
> > >=20
> > > --=3D20
> > > George Hester
> > > __________________________________
> > > "George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote in message =3D
> > > news:OwrkSZmoCHA.2424@TK2MSFTNGP12...
> > > Yes you may be able to help me with something. My Guerst user keeps =
> =3D
> > > getting enabled and put in the Administrator group. How?
> > >=20
> > > --=3D20
> > > George Hester
> > > __________________________________
> > > "Karl Levinson [x y] mvp" <levinson_k@excite.com> wrote in message =
> =3D
> > > news:eleuHGkoCHA.1628@TK2MSFTNGP12...
> > > > Do you have a problem we could help you with? Are there more =
> details?
> > > >=3D20
> > > > What does this code have to do with NTFS? I'm sorry if your =
> machine =3D
> > > was
If you set the lockout minutes to "0", notice that the caption changes
from "Account is locked out for:" to "Account is locked out until an
administrator unlocks it." This is not an account-specific setting, as
you correctly surmised.
If your audit logs aren't showing anything, this is surely a curious
matter. Especially if you enable Success and Failure audits of "account
logon events", "account management", "logon events", "policy change",
and "privilege use".
As others here have said, I cannot believe that Windows is doing this
itself. The one thing I might test is trying to log in using the guest
account and the 14-character password I suggested you put on the guest
account. IF Windows itself, though a bug, is taking these actions, I
would still find it amazingly unlikely that it would ever CHANGE THE
PASSWORD on the account by itself. So, if the 14-character password
does NOT still work, I'd say that you MUST have a malware program on
your system. If it does still work, then you may have additional time
to solve your problem since it is unlikely somebody would guess your 14-
character password (assuming you make it VERY tough and that the malware
program, if it exists, is not capturing keystrokes).
Good luck.
- Next message: Alun Jones: "Re: EvidenceEliminator"
- Previous message: Strickland: "Win2k Security Groups"
- In reply to: George Hester: "Re: Is it really true that NTFS is secure?"
- Next in thread: George Hester: "Re: Is it really true that NTFS is secure?"
- Reply: George Hester: "Re: Is it really true that NTFS is secure?"
- Reply: George Hester: "Re: Is it really true that NTFS is secure?"
- Reply: George Hester: "Re: Is it really true that NTFS is secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|