Re: Trojan Horses Popular To The Malicious Hackers
From: Me (no_address_for_stinking_spammers_to_abuse@x-ray.gs)
Date: 11/21/02
- Next message: x y: "Re: Brute force attack but no IP's in log??"
- Previous message: David Cross [MS]: "Re: Cryptography - key signing"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Mike: "Re: Trojan Horses Popular To The Malicious Hackers"
- Next in thread: Bill Sanderson: "Re: Trojan Horses Popular To The Malicious Hackers"
- Reply: Bill Sanderson: "Re: Trojan Horses Popular To The Malicious Hackers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Me <no_address_for_stinking_spammers_to_abuse@x-ray.gs> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 09:43:14 -0500
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:29:43 +0000, Mike <du@b> wrote:
>Question...
>Say the target is running an clean OS like Win2k or XP Pro and
>has a decent AV program running. Also, the mark has disabled
>browser JS, ActiveX, etc., only accepts emails from trusted
>sources (the rest being deleted at the server) and *never* runs
>any 'cute' little .exe files. Our mark has also taken the time to
>disable any and all unnecessary NT "services" and doesn't even
>have the likes of IIS installed.
>
>Ok? So we have a relatively clean OS connected to the net 24/7.
>
>However, there's *no* firewall...
>
>Can a hacker compromise that system and if so, how?
More than one way.
See Earlier Thread:
Auto-Execute *with parameters* through IE anyone? <new, unpatched>
- Next message: x y: "Re: Brute force attack but no IP's in log??"
- Previous message: David Cross [MS]: "Re: Cryptography - key signing"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Mike: "Re: Trojan Horses Popular To The Malicious Hackers"
- Next in thread: Bill Sanderson: "Re: Trojan Horses Popular To The Malicious Hackers"
- Reply: Bill Sanderson: "Re: Trojan Horses Popular To The Malicious Hackers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
