Re: .NET security and W2K Security
From: Girish Bhatia (nospam.gibhatia@sogeti-usa.com)
Date: 10/09/02
- Next message: Jim Harrison: "Re: Firewall for dynamically blocking hackers"
- Previous message: Mark Guzowski: "A truly screwed up bug in Outlook '02, part IV (Q stuff)"
- In reply to: Michel Gallant (MVP): "Re: .NET security and W2K Security"
- Next in thread: Kenji Yamamoto: "Re: .NET security and W2K Security"
- Reply: Kenji Yamamoto: "Re: .NET security and W2K Security"
- Reply: S. Pidgorny [MVP]: "Re: .NET security and W2K Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Girish Bhatia" <nospam.gibhatia@sogeti-usa.com> Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:41:43 -0700
Does this mean that .NET security is independent of W2K security, and the
assemblies do not rely on W2K security?
"Michel Gallant (MVP)" <neutron@istar.ca> wrote in message
news:3DA355CA.AB5D7BD6@istar.ca...
> See also the "Key Security Concepts" in .net:
>
>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/cpguide/htm
l/cpconkeyconceptsinsecurity.asp
> - Mitch
>
> "Michel Gallant (MVP)" wrote:
>
> > Have a read of this article:
> >
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/itsolutio
ns/net/evaluate/fsnetsec.asp
> >
> > - Michel Gallant MVP Security
> >
> > Girish Bhatia wrote:
> >
> > > Whats the difference between the two and could someone throw some
light on
> > > when to use one or the other?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > GB
>
- Next message: Jim Harrison: "Re: Firewall for dynamically blocking hackers"
- Previous message: Mark Guzowski: "A truly screwed up bug in Outlook '02, part IV (Q stuff)"
- In reply to: Michel Gallant (MVP): "Re: .NET security and W2K Security"
- Next in thread: Kenji Yamamoto: "Re: .NET security and W2K Security"
- Reply: Kenji Yamamoto: "Re: .NET security and W2K Security"
- Reply: S. Pidgorny [MVP]: "Re: .NET security and W2K Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|