Re: MS02-50 - Windows 95 or not?
From: Me (reply_in@newsgroup.only)
Date: 09/07/02
- Next message: Me: "Re: Bug Triad Whacks Microsoft Browser"
- Previous message: MIKE: "128 BIT ENCRYPTION"
- In reply to: Chris Wood: "Re: MS02-50 - Windows 95 or not?"
- Next in thread: Ray: "Re: MS02-50 - Windows 95 or not? - YES!"
- Reply: Ray: "Re: MS02-50 - Windows 95 or not? - YES!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Me" <reply_in@newsgroup.only> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 18:11:15 -0400
Hi Chris,
Yeah I know, but "someone" where I work now thinks he made a good decision
a few years ago by not upgrading everyone off 95.
The fellow who found the initial problem has a test URL set up and he sent
it to me to try. Can't do it until Monday since I don't have anything older
than W2K at home. I'll post the results in a response to this thread.
Ray
"Chris Wood" <chris.wood@gov.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:u9gyEkeVCHA.4228@tkmsftngp08...
> It might affect it Ray but Win 95 is now unsupported so there will be no
> fix.
>
> Chris Wood
> Alberta Department of Energy
> CANADA
>
> "Ray" <reply_in@newsgroup.only> wrote in message
> news:ecUTLdeVCHA.1976@tkmsftngp11...
> > Hi,
> >
> > A WSJ article claims this vulnerability only affects NT (circa 1996) and
> > later and by inference does not affect Windows 95. I know Win 98 was a
> giant
> > bug fix for 95. Has anyone seen anything to confirm that this affects
> > Windows 95 also?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ray
> >
> >
>
>
- Next message: Me: "Re: Bug Triad Whacks Microsoft Browser"
- Previous message: MIKE: "128 BIT ENCRYPTION"
- In reply to: Chris Wood: "Re: MS02-50 - Windows 95 or not?"
- Next in thread: Ray: "Re: MS02-50 - Windows 95 or not? - YES!"
- Reply: Ray: "Re: MS02-50 - Windows 95 or not? - YES!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|