Re: MS02-50 - Windows 95 or not?
From: Chris Wood (chris.wood@gov.ab.ca)
Date: 09/06/02
- Next message: MIKE: "128 BIT ENCRYPTION"
- Previous message: Ray: "MS02-50 - Windows 95 or not?"
- In reply to: Ray: "MS02-50 - Windows 95 or not?"
- Next in thread: Me: "Re: MS02-50 - Windows 95 or not?"
- Reply: Me: "Re: MS02-50 - Windows 95 or not?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Chris Wood" <chris.wood@gov.ab.ca> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 15:05:41 -0600
It might affect it Ray but Win 95 is now unsupported so there will be no
fix.
Chris Wood
Alberta Department of Energy
CANADA
"Ray" <reply_in@newsgroup.only> wrote in message
news:ecUTLdeVCHA.1976@tkmsftngp11...
> Hi,
>
> A WSJ article claims this vulnerability only affects NT (circa 1996) and
> later and by inference does not affect Windows 95. I know Win 98 was a
giant
> bug fix for 95. Has anyone seen anything to confirm that this affects
> Windows 95 also?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ray
>
>
- Next message: MIKE: "128 BIT ENCRYPTION"
- Previous message: Ray: "MS02-50 - Windows 95 or not?"
- In reply to: Ray: "MS02-50 - Windows 95 or not?"
- Next in thread: Me: "Re: MS02-50 - Windows 95 or not?"
- Reply: Me: "Re: MS02-50 - Windows 95 or not?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
