Re: Burning CDs
From: k (DR@netscape.net)
Date: 07/12/02
- Next message: Ned Flanders: "Re: Java Virtual Machine for Windows XP"
- Previous message: Lior Messinger: "a question about port scan"
- In reply to: Ryan: "Re: Burning CDs"
- Next in thread: Arnt Karlsen: "Re: Burning CDs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "k" <DR@netscape.net> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:55:27 -0700
Ryan, does Nero sounds like a Microsoft software to
you.Like i said in my very first post, I use nero to burn
my CDs not WMP. But you apply the patch, the security is
not only limited to WMP, it affects all ripping burning
softwares.
>-----Original Message-----
>You do not have an "explicit right to make copies - as
many as you want" -
>you have agreed to upload the terms of the EULA by
installing the software.
>Until those terms are overturned in a court of law, you
are legally bound by
>the EULA. And, if the EULA states that you can not make
copies of
>copyrighted software/music then you must abide by that.
Of course, you DO
>have the option have finding another software program
that will allow you to
>make copies. You just can't use Microsoft's....
>
>"Børre Fjeldsø" <bgf@tirsdagsklubben.nu> wrote in message
>news:m3vg7lfkjw.fsf@mkarelt010.MARKEDSKRAFT.COM...
>> "Ryan" <NtMyzst@netscape.net> writes:
>>
>> > I understand your problem perfectly. What you are
trying to do is to
>make a
>> > copy of copyrighted material.
>>
>> So what?
>>
>> > Even your copy (CDR) Linux Redhat 7.3 is copyrighted
material. Your
>> > previous disc copy method simply copied the
copyright information over
>to
>> > your new copy.
>>
>> With an explicit right to make copies. As many as you
like...
>>
>> > Thanks to the new security patch, Windows will now
recognize the copy
>> > protection on the CDs that you copy (which is why
you cannot copy some
>music
>> > CDs).
>>
>> Is Microsoft a law enforcement agency? In Norway the
law states that I
>> am allowed to make copies of CD's for my own use. Why
should Microsoft
>> deny me that right? When a company starts to uphold
the law by
>> themself, without prompting from the government, you
should always ask
>> where the money is.
>>
>> > Your following comment, "...Am not able to make
copies of CDs that i
>bought
>> > with my on money...." is indicative about your
complete lack of
>> > understanding of current copyright laws. Even with
music cds, you do
>not
>> > OWN the music that resides on them. You simply own
the license to
>LISTEN to
>> > the music.
>>
>> Irrelevant. Where is Microsofts right to uphold the
law? What
>> jurisdiction do they have? In America the principle is
that you are
>> innocent until proven guilty. Microsoft says you are
guilty before the
>> fact. Doesn't that scare you? What is the next? Cars
that refuse to
>> start because you aren't the owner? Or calls the
insurance company
>> when you are speeding?
>>
>> Besides when Microsoft starts upholding the law they
might become a
>> target when someone circumvents the protection. What
happens if I use
>> a Microsoft system to make 10 000 copies of a PS2 game
and sell the
>> copies and Sony takes MS to court for not preventing
this?
>>
>> //Børre Fjeldsø
>>
>> --
>> Børre Fjeldsø
>>
>> Signature under construction ...
>> ... I apologize for any inconvenience during the
construction period
>
>
>.
>
- Next message: Ned Flanders: "Re: Java Virtual Machine for Windows XP"
- Previous message: Lior Messinger: "a question about port scan"
- In reply to: Ryan: "Re: Burning CDs"
- Next in thread: Arnt Karlsen: "Re: Burning CDs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
