Re: exchange security
From: Matt Barton (nerd@netmonkey.net)
Date: 05/26/02
- Next message: S. Pidgorny [MVP]: "Re: e-mail in outlook express"
- Previous message: Robert Moir: "Re: user-level access control on win98"
- In reply to: Lanwench: "Re: exchange security"
- Next in thread: S. Pidgorny [MVP]: "Re: exchange security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Matt Barton <nerd@netmonkey.net> Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 14:22:05 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 26 May 2002, Lanwench wrote:
> Yes, but that isn't good enough for Exchange - you want to exclude all
> the Exchange directories from the file-level scan and install something
> like ScanMail for Exchange.
Re-read the thread. I said earlier that there was a scanner made by Trend
Micro made specifically for Exchange. I was just sharing my appreciation
of their ServerProtect product.
- --
Matt Barton nerd@netmonkey.net
Indianapolis, IN http://www.mattbarton.ws/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE88TXf0MGobtNQgm0RAiiJAJ9orlmbCczVeFB75MVEvcyD+dfOdQCgy6qz
QV5KLJqaULwmypfNl76hueQ=
=izlp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Next message: S. Pidgorny [MVP]: "Re: e-mail in outlook express"
- Previous message: Robert Moir: "Re: user-level access control on win98"
- In reply to: Lanwench: "Re: exchange security"
- Next in thread: S. Pidgorny [MVP]: "Re: exchange security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
