Re: exchange security
From: Lanwench (lanwench@nospamplease.yahoo.com)
Date: 05/26/02
- Next message: Robert Burris: "Re: exchange security"
- Previous message: Lanwench: "Re: user-level access control on win98"
- In reply to: Matt Barton: "Re: exchange security"
- Next in thread: Robert Burris: "Re: exchange security"
- Reply: Robert Burris: "Re: exchange security"
- Reply: Matt Barton: "Re: exchange security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Lanwench" <lanwench@nospamplease.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 10:57:58 -0400
Yes, but that isn't good enough for Exchange - you want to exclude all the
Exchange directories from the file-level scan and install something like
ScanMail for Exchange.
"Matt Barton" <mattyb77@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:20020526092527.Q40017-100000@jupiter.homeunix.net...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 25 May 2002, Lang wrote:
>
> > I love Trend Mirco, suggested
>
> We're using ServerProtect on our Windows 2000 servers. Never had any
> problems with it. Updates by itself every night, across the whole network
> without me having to do a thing.
>
> - --
>
> Matt Barton mattyb77@newsguy.com
> Indianapolis, IN http://www.mattbarton.ws/
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)
>
> iD8DBQE88PCO0MGobtNQgm0RAo8xAKCfY+gA2uyZGMV1w6E6UszzIcZf9wCcD6tU
> n5eNSYBp+D57ez2Tjuzumm0=
> =YpLD
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
- Next message: Robert Burris: "Re: exchange security"
- Previous message: Lanwench: "Re: user-level access control on win98"
- In reply to: Matt Barton: "Re: exchange security"
- Next in thread: Robert Burris: "Re: exchange security"
- Reply: Robert Burris: "Re: exchange security"
- Reply: Matt Barton: "Re: exchange security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
