Re: NT 4.0 Stand alone Server Un-securing
From: Lanwench (lanwench@nospamplease.yahoo.com)
Date: 05/17/02
- Next message: Ned Flanders: "Re: NT 4.0 Stand alone Server Un-securing"
- Previous message: Lanwench: "Re: NT 4.0 Stand alone Server Un-securing"
- In reply to: Deniz \(baby-boy on the way...!!!\): "NT 4.0 Stand alone Server Un-securing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Lanwench" <lanwench@nospamplease.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:04:35 -0400
I relate, but you do have to have some basic standards of what is supported
on your network.
"Deniz (baby-boy on the way...!!!)" <denizgroff@cox.net> wrote in message
news:45e001c1fd5e$55ffb8a0$39ef2ecf@TKMSFTNGXA08...
> You are 100 % correct & I couldn't agree with you
> more.....However, I'm dealing with some people who bring-
> in their own units (laptops, etc.). Needless to say we do
> catch every virus that floats down the river. At least I
> can say I have valuable experience waste-ing days @ a time
> recovering system problems because of end-user virus
> imports. At least I still have a job.....God Bless End-
> Users.......& 13 year-old internet hoax's\viruses...!!
>
> Deniz
- Next message: Ned Flanders: "Re: NT 4.0 Stand alone Server Un-securing"
- Previous message: Lanwench: "Re: NT 4.0 Stand alone Server Un-securing"
- In reply to: Deniz \(baby-boy on the way...!!!\): "NT 4.0 Stand alone Server Un-securing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]