Re: Antivirus 2008/2009

I tried to reply this morning, but it either did not go through, or it's
just not showing up on my end. Just in case it failed to go through, here is
this morning's reply.

Your writing style, or actually the lack thereof, indicates a person who
knows he/she is losing, and is incapable of continuing an adult
conversation. It frequently happens that when one is confronted with
logical, adult, reasonable information and requests, one stoops to calling
names as you have just done, and using profanity, as you have done a lot on
your blog. You remind me of my little brother when he was losing an
argument. He would pick one word out of a 30-minute argument and try to
defend it, ignoring all the other accusations and requests for proof. You
just did the same thing.

I took a few minutes to read your blog (after turning off my firewall porn
and malware filters to be able to see the site) and it revealed a writing
style that is profane and childish, with YOU making yourself appear to be a
crazed person.

You stated, "...and you could not." Ah, here again you ASSUME that I
***could not*** back my statement, when in reality I merely **did not**
because it was late and I was tired. Today I have to be on a job in an hour,
so I cannot take the time to do so, but that does not mean I never saw the
information.

However, had I taken the time that late at night at the end of a long week
to bore myself with reading all about you again, and had I posted the link,
it would have made no difference to your mind to prove anything to YOU.
***Many others have posted evidence*** here and elsewhere regarding your
lack of integrity and standing as an MVP, and you just deny it, over and
over again, without ANY proof that what you say is true.

If I dig up a link to the information I found where a Microsoft employee
said you were not an MVP, you will simply claim it to be false, as you have
already done with others.

If it will make you happy, I'll dig for it again, but ***only AFTER YOU
answer the one request*** many people have made and you have been unwilling
or unable to provide...PROVE YOU ARE A CURRENT Microsoft MVP.

As you stated, "All you had to do was post that link to prove what you said
and you could not." Why can't YOU (or won't you) post some proof to prove
those people are lying about you?

Heck, I can put "President of the USA" as my name in a newsgroup, but that
doesn't make me George Bush. Putting "MVP" in your posting nickname does not
make you one, either.

So, how about you man up (or be a an adult woman, now that your blog says
you are female) and prove you are a Microsoft-awarded current MVP once and
for all. Prove that the statements made about you stealing others' code is
false. That is all I ask.

If you can do that, I'll waste more of my time wading through the myriad
posts about you to find that reference again. As I said before, until you
man up, NO ONE has any reason to believe a single word you say. Put your
money where your mouth is. Until you do, I will have EVERY REASON to think
it is you who is lying.

Gregg Hill




"The Real Truth MVP" <toidi@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:h4cuk.21101$uE5.164@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A new troll has emerged. All you had to do was post that link to prove
what you said and you could not. Why can't anybody post some proof to prove
those lies about me.

--
Cyberstalking is a crime. If you had one as bad as I did simply ignoring
them is not an option.




"Gregg Hill" <greggmhill at please do not spam me at yahoo dot com> wrote
in message news:OsKXcPnCJHA.2056@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Liar, liar, pants on fire!" Is that your only defense? (Yes, I know you
did not use those exact words, so don't get all excited.)

You stated, "You are mistaking MVP's with MS employees, they are not. So
you can't even understand what you are reading."

Apparently, you thought that I do not even know what an MVP is, so I
chose to stoop very low (again) and answer your ***ridiculous***
ASSUMPTION. I posted one link showing ***that I do know what an MVP is***
and you somehow think that is a "lie" on my part? NOWHERE did I say that
the link had anything to do with my previous searches for your specific
"The Real Truth MVP" misnomer. The two comments are TOTALLY UNRELATED.

How about YOU step up and ***be a man*** and GIVE US A LINK proving that
you are an MVP, i.e., a real official ***current*** Microsoft-awarded
"Most Valuable Professional"? Or are you too chicken?

Until you man up, NO ONE has any reason to believe a single word you say.
Put your money where your mouth is. Until you do, I will have EVERY
REASON to think it is you who is lying.

Gregg Hill




"The Real Truth MVP" <toidi@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0I0uk.18251$LG4.17776@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Well the you lied when you said this "I found in Google searches
evidence from Microsoft employees indicating that you are not an MVP" MS
would not post anything saying that for two reasons.

1. Because I am a current MS MVP and they know it.
2. MS employees who deal with this stuff do not posts to newsgroups.

Now do you want to back up your lie by posting a link to that Google
search?


--
Cyberstalking is a crime. If you had one as bad as I did simply ignoring
them is not an option.




"Gregg Hill" <greggmhill at please do not spam me at yahoo dot com>
wrote in message news:%23JtOOhiCJHA.4368@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Indeed I do! http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/gp/mvpawardintro

Gregg Hill


"---Fitz---" <---fitz---@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:udS5Y6ZCJHA.5316@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"The Real Truth MVP" <toidi@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6BLtk.11734$vn7.3478@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You are mistaking MVP's with MS employees, they are not. So you can't
even understand what you are reading.

--
I think he understands perfectly what he's reading.








.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Antivirus 2008/2009
    ... You stated, "You are mistaking MVP's with MS employees, they are not. ... So you can't even understand what you are reading." ... NOWHERE did I say that the link had anything to do with my previous searches for your specific "The Real Truth MVP" misnomer. ... NO ONE has any reason to believe a single word you say. ...
    (microsoft.public.security.virus)
  • Re: TROLL ALERT
    ... You spouted your big mouth off like all the other trolls do who have no proof of the allegations they make. ... If I dig up a link to the information I found where a Microsoft employee ... said you were not an MVP, you will simply claim it to be false, as you have ... NO ONE has any reason to believe a single word you say. ...
    (microsoft.public.security.virus)
  • Re: Restart Window Service
    ... (And the code shown is incorrect no matter what the goal is). ... There is no reason to use a wait hint other than 0 if the type is not a _PENDING type ... MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
  • Re: You are a f*****t. A moronic, clueless, cretinous, imbecilic, idiotic,
    ... this is one MVP who certainly *will not* stick up for her. ... >to come alive.For some reason some of the regulars in this group (the xp ... >groups) and a few of the MVP's stick up for her, maybe because she is nasty ... >> 3) Your 'advice', as well as being dangerous, is so poorly written ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers)
  • Re: Listbox selected line mostly just below bottom of window
    ... It's on my MVP Tips site. ... While a global handle variable is extremely poor style, it is not the reason for the ... and the RedrawWindow is completely irrelevant to the solution of the problem; ... not surprised to learn the programming methods aren't great. ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)