Re: Which of the following do you recommend for anti-virus ware?



There is really nothing to question.
You are an admitted thief.
EVERYTHING you say should be treated as a lie since that is the nature of thieves.
Lying is often necessary to conceal the true intentions.
With most, their word has value, your has NONE.
You steal without regard.
You have stolen from every honest person who pays for the products you steal since you have decided others subsidize your own unethical behavior.

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org


"Virus Guy" <Virus@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:472533E7.6486431C@xxxxxxxxxx
When there are countless posts asking "what's the best AV" or "how
does this av compare to that av", I never see anyone responding with:

- malware can turn off your AV, so look for AV that can resist

- detection isin't removal. Look for AV that can remove what it
detects

- these days, detection means something got onto your system
a week ago. Do other things like update your Java JRE, use
a hosts file, use adaware/spybot/spyware blaster (innoculate
your browser), put more faith in a registry monitoring program
than in an AV program


Go ahead and question that ^^^^^^

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Harshman, Felsenstein & Dembski
    ... at least a human level intelligence while being well beyond the realm ... of any known non-deliberate force of nature. ... intelligence so as to be detected or detectable by humans. ... The arguments for the detection of ID are the same for SETI scientists ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Which of the following do you recommend for anti-virus ware?
    ... When there are countless posts asking "what's the best AV" or "how ... does this av compare to that av", I never see anyone responding with: ... detection means something got onto your system ... put more faith in a registry monitoring program ...
    (microsoft.public.security.virus)
  • Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
    ... > Apart from the fact that the quoted text is very general in nature and ... > laboratory examination. ... but detection is problematical if no-one uses laboratory ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
    ... Eric Stevens wrote: ... > Apart from the fact that the quoted text is very general in nature and ... but their detection is problematical is no-one is looking for ...
    (sci.archaeology)