Re: Is Microsoft aware?


"p jayant" <p.n.jayant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1189762336.216128.55390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

SystemSecure or Ultimate Cleaner are obviously not fly-by-night
operators. They are blatantly advertising through their web-pages.If
such operators are fraudulently using proprietary features of Windows
like the Windows System Security Alarm Box not only to create the
impression that their products are recommended by Microsoft but
infecting Microsoft user Systems with Trojan Worms to terrorize
Microsoft customers into buying their software, Microsoft cannot wash
their hands off by pointing out at the all-out campaign they have
carried on of warning their customers of malware attacks. I am not a
legal expert and do not know what penalties apply for such heinous
crimes in different countries but Microsoft customers would expect
Microsoft to put terrorists like SystemSecure and Ultimate Cleaner out
of business through legal action.

I'd love to know if you really believe this or if you make a point of
drinking heavily before every single post, or what.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [Full-disclosure] Compromising pictures of Microsoft Internet Explorer!
    ... more value to those who want to fix problems, than to those exploiting ... Microsoft customers - Microsoft should. ... or they will come up with ridiculous recommendations ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: Another company nuked by M$
    ... > 1) Some company invents a neat new computer technology. ... > to provide the service via Microsoft to Microsoft customers. ... > over another profitable computer marketplace. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: How to prevent Virus W32.klez.gen@mm
    ... installing all security patches from Microsoft is never a ... > OTOH installing the Korean version of Visual Studio could be very bad for ... Microsoft, Microsoft, Microsoft and Microsoft in that order. ... Microsoft customers never requested, are used by less than 1% of Microsoft ...
    (microsoft.public.security)