Re: A new 'Beta' test from Panda
- From: "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 20:36:18 +0100
OK - a question for you Fitz - I'm always willing to learn.
I have no problem seeing IP addresses in the messages of others here. I'm
puzzled.
Will you please explain why I cannot see any IP address listed in the
'Properties' of your posts here? TIA
David
"---Fitz---" <---fitz---@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46ad7402$0$4716$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I learn by reading threads pertinent to the newsgroup I'm in, in this case
microsoft.public.security.virus. You're posting NO solutions or
questions...just babbling about who is Peter, who is genuine, Annexcafe,
people following you from other newsgroups and other off-the-wall stuff as
evidenced in your message:
____________
"I know *exactly* what I have been doing. YOU, on the other hand, have
*not*
been staight-forward and honest. I asked you HOW you found me here - and
you
completely ignored my question. Good people have absolutely nothing to
fear
from me. Peter refuses at every stage to answer my questions. He is a big
boy (whoever he is) and would be, I'm sure, quite capable of standing up
for
himself if he was honest and true (which, as you know, I doubt). No-one
I've
ever met 'in the flesh' so to speak, has ever referred to the loss of my
son
as 'frustrating' - the term used by Mr Foldes. That was a red rag to a
bull.
You and I have absolutely no idea who this poster is ........ and no-one
else seems in the least bit concerned. Well I am - and will continue with
this 'crusading' (as you call it) until I am satisfied that nothing
untoward
is happening on Annexcafe.
I thought I'd turned a corner after I'd trashed my suspected (infected) PC
and continued posting as 'beady'. I thought that I'd played by the rules
but
then, suddenly, out of the blue, Li banned me again. When I asked why, I
was
belittled and purported to be a fool. There is, whether you realise it or
not, something amiss. If there are people involved in malicious practices
*anywhere*, believe me, they /will/ be pursued!
As I've said already, this is *not* a game. It is in deadly earnest. So
now
you know.
David"
____________
And this:
____________
"Hello Dave
I trust you haven't followed /me/ here! (were you actively seeking ME?)
Hundreds of MS groups aren't there - HOW /did/ you find me?
Perhaps your intentions are good and you are trying to help me BUT when
you
say " Maybe if you don't understand the nature of things like this, you
should leave well alone?" .......... some might interpret that as a
veiled
threat."
____________
What does this have to do with this newsgroup? You're starting to sound
like a whack job to me and I've never read your posts before you came to
this newsgroup. Once again...WHO CARES?
"BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eHkyHWg0HHA.5380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I care Fitz - I am dead against the bad guys. Have you never even
considered where the viruses and spyware come from? If /everyone/ buries
their head in the sand, the actual perpetrators of malware will *never* be
caught. Life is, indeed, short. Eradication of those who seek to do us
harm is, in my book, a worthwhile cause. If /you/ don't care, don't read
the thread. ;)
BD
___________________________________________________________________________________
"---Fitz---" <---fitz---@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46abbca8$0$12183$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Really...WHO CARES? This is a newsgroup about .security.virus, not who
you can trust on usenet. Simple, short answer, don't trust anyone. If
you've been "tracking" someone for 18 months then you are fixated on
them. Life's too short for that crap and this thread is too long for
this crap. Case closed.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A new 'Beta' test from Panda
- From: ---Fitz---
- Re: A new 'Beta' test from Panda
- Prev by Date: Re: A new 'Beta' test from Panda
- Next by Date: Re: A new 'Beta' test from Panda
- Previous by thread: Re: Action Plan!
- Next by thread: Re: A new 'Beta' test from Panda
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|