Re: XP's Firewall

On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:17:57 GMT, Leythos <void@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You have'nt proved anything. Normally you yourself will not accept
anything unless all facts are present.

Lets see, I've clearly stated what Windows Firewall allows to happen,
what it fails to provide, and not once have you stated that I was wrong.

You stated your opinion and I have stated mine. It has nothing to do
with proof. Now you just continue ignoring my comments.

How can you say I've not proven anything if you have not said I'm wrong.

Aha. So that's your definition of a proof - interresting... that
really has changed within a short time period...

Either you can't read or you're blind - I clearly stated the failings,
multiple times, of the Windows XP firewall.

Yes, you did. According to your own criteria. That's not impressive.

And since you seem to believe in the nonsense of controlling something
already allowed to run (in awfully many cases with admin rights) we
will never come to an agreement.

And you fail to understand that it doesn't have to be as it currently
is, it could have been a real firewall service that doesn't provide open
access to its functions/methods/rules.

And you fail to understand or accept that it does inbound protection
well. You keep deliberately mixing that up with things going on on the
inside to support your own agenda.

If fails in all cases, and you've agreed,

It fails according to your own criteria. That's not impressive.

but you keep wanting people to believe that Windows XP Firewall
is good because that's your Opinion.

A very simplistic statement. If that's the only conclusion you can
draw based on a lengthy discussion, it clearly shows your intention.

Show where the statements I've clearly defined concerning the Windows XP
firewall are not true and we'll have something to discuss.

Anyone can see that the statements I've made are true, it would take a
MAC user to miss the truth.

You are doing a great job twisting things to fit your agenda.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: MAXIMA on WINDOWS XP
    ... -> fails ... >>> and did you install from precompiled rpms or did you compile it? ... >>> If you can't find the control panel you might try ... > I'm guessing the Windows XP Firewall, introduced with SP2, ...
    (sci.math.symbolic)
  • Re: SP2 Firewall blocks outgoing FTP requests
    ... I have contacted microsoft SP2 tech support at 1-800-936-5700 and they told ... > the firewall it works. ... If I turn on the firewall it fails. ... > I try changing the Use Passive FTP setting in IE ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: SP2 Firewall blocks outgoing FTP requests
    ... I have contacted microsoft SP2 tech support at 1-800-936-5700 and they told ... > the firewall it works. ... If I turn on the firewall it fails. ... > I try changing the Use Passive FTP setting in IE ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: NAT traversal problem with Messenger RA.
    ... Do you have the Upnp framework exception enabled in your Windows Firewall ... 32-bit on both my machines fails to get the proper WAN IP address. ... the SSDP engine appears to be working fine. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.messenger)
  • RE: Internet Explorer cannot display the web page
    ... "daviedoug" wrote: ... My wife's is connected via the Network. ... Firewall off and done the installation?. ... I don't know what you mean with windows Firewall, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)