Re: XP's Firewall
- From: B. Nice <b__nice@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:44:37 GMT
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:42:23 GMT, Leythos <void@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't like "Personal Firewalls", but, even as crappy as the Windows
Firewall is
It's crappy in your opinion. Not in mine.
they have a place for any user connecting to an
unknown/untrusted network.
No. Not for ANY user. For users offering services of some kind - or
for users with unpatched machines (since you seem to be focused on
being precise).
As an example, I always use a PFW solution on our laptops when connecting
to any network outside of our secure network
in the office - even customers networks that we've designed. I use the
inbound reporting/monitoring features to see what traffic is hitting my
node in their network in addition to monitoring their firewall device.
Good for you.
I don't like Windows XP Firewall because it's not informative, allows
changes to be made without users understanding and sometimes without
knowing about the changes, and because there is no real-time reporting
on inbound and outbound.
And that's your opinion - based on your needs. Many users have no need
for that info.
.
- References:
- XP's Firewall
- From: B.W.
- Re: XP's Firewall
- From: RJK
- Re: XP's Firewall
- From: B . Nice
- Re: XP's Firewall
- From: RJK
- Re: XP's Firewall
- From: B . Nice
- Re: XP's Firewall
- From: Kerry Brown
- Re: XP's Firewall
- From: B . Nice
- Re: XP's Firewall
- From: B . Nice
- XP's Firewall
- Prev by Date: Re: XP's Firewall
- Next by Date: Re: XP's Firewall
- Previous by thread: Re: XP's Firewall
- Next by thread: Re: XP's Firewall
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading