Re: Need for firewall when machines are behind a NAT router ?
- From: "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:03:36 -0500
From: "pickluh" <pickluh@xxxxxxxxx>
| You can never be "to redundant" when it comes to taking measure to
| protect yourself. I'm pretty sure the only safe computer is unplugged,
| placed in a lead box, and buried 10' below ground
Now -- Then you'll take the chance of Earth Worms :-)
--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm
.
- References:
- Need for firewall when machines are behind a NAT router ?
- From: Dimitri
- Re: Need for firewall when machines are behind a NAT router ?
- From: Bruce Chambers
- Re: Need for firewall when machines are behind a NAT router ?
- From: pickluh
- Need for firewall when machines are behind a NAT router ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Need for firewall when machines are behind a NAT router ?
- Next by Date: Re: Need for firewall when machines are behind a NAT router ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Need for firewall when machines are behind a NAT router ?
- Next by thread: Re: Need for firewall when machines are behind a NAT router ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|