Re: Need for firewall when machines are behind a NAT router ?
- From: "pickluh" <pickluh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 2 Dec 2005 10:40:51 -0800
You can never be "to redundant" when it comes to taking measure to
protect yourself. I'm pretty sure the only safe computer is unplugged,
placed in a lead box, and buried 10' below ground
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Need for firewall when machines are behind a NAT router ?
- From: Alun Jones
- Re: Need for firewall when machines are behind a NAT router ?
- From: David H. Lipman
- Re: Need for firewall when machines are behind a NAT router ?
- References:
- Need for firewall when machines are behind a NAT router ?
- From: Dimitri
- Re: Need for firewall when machines are behind a NAT router ?
- From: Bruce Chambers
- Need for firewall when machines are behind a NAT router ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Spyware.Apropos.C Watch for it!
- Next by Date: Re: Spyware.Apropos.C Watch for it!
- Previous by thread: Re: Need for firewall when machines are behind a NAT router ?
- Next by thread: Re: Need for firewall when machines are behind a NAT router ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|