Re: WinFixer 2005

Thank you so much.

"Phil Weldon" <notdiscosed@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:muFjf.7789$N45.4450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Finding newsgroup messages:
> Two main choices
> #1. Use your newsreader; the directions are in the 'Help' file of
> Outlook Express. The search function of Outlook Express will only search
> headers you have download, and search posts you have downloaded.
>
> #2. Use Google. Google will search across newsgroups and will
> search ALL posts from a few hours from the present to years in the past.
> a. Google has the archieves of all Usenet newsgroups
> (and
> defacto Usenet newsgroups like the microsoft.public.* constellation.
> These
> google archieves extend years into the past, while news servers hold posts
> for a limited time that depends on who is maintaining the server.
> b. To use Google newsgroup search to search in Usenet
> newsgroups
> (1.) go to http://www.google.com/
> (2.) left click on [groups] (above the fill-in
> slot)
> (3.) right click on [advanced search] (to the
> right of the 'Search Groups' button
> (4.) fill in the search information in the
> appropriate slots
> (5.) Example searches
> (a.) entering
> microsoft.public.security.virus in the 'Group' slot
> AND
> David H. Lipman in the
> 'Author' slot
> returns ~ 3330 cites
> (b.) entering the words [ virus
> remove ] in the 'with all of the words' slot
> AND
>
> microsoft.public.security.virus
> in the 'Group' slot
> AND
> David H. Lipman in the
> 'Author' slot
> returns ~ 534 cites
> (c.) entering the words [ Swen
> worm ] in the 'with all of the words' slot
> AND
>
> microsoft.public.security.virus
> in the 'Group' slot
> AND
> Phil Weldon in the 'Author'
> slot
> returns ~ 261 cites.
>
> I think form this you can see that David H. Lipman is a very frequent
> poster
> (in fact I am suprised there were not a lot more cites). Though I have
> worked with computers since 1965, my experience with malware is fairly
> limited, and I try to restrain my posts to subjects with which I have some
> experience.
>
> Keep in mind that 'Google Groups' are not the same as Usenet newsgroups,
> and
> tend to be frequented by less knowledgeable users.
>
> I use the google search to find information and ALSO to check the
> reliability of posters based on looking at the range of what they have
> posted and checking some of the replies. Of course, some posters change
> their name quite often to defeat this kind of check-up.
>
> I hope this helps, and makes newsgroups more valuble to you.
>
> Phil Weldon
>
>
> "Phyllis" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:OvNUKXo9FHA.2364@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | Again, thank you for your help in my time of need. There is one thing
> that
> | I am going to have to do, and that is to learn more on how to use the
> | newsgroups. I don't know how to search in Outlook Express for past
> | discussions on the problem at hand. If I had I might have found the
> post
> by
> | Jim Byrd. I did contact the person by e-mail on McAfee Forum that was
> | supposed to have developed the tool that you sent to me. He e-mailed me
> | back and said that it would be impossible for someone else to take
> credit
> | for the work he had done because he had a welcome screen at the
> beginning
> of
> | the fix. I don't remember seeing that welcome screen, but my memory is
> not
> | what it used to be. Anyway, no matter to me who wrote the thing, it
> worked,
> | and I appreciate very much the help.
> |
> | "Service Mstr" <fivecornersme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> | news:uNulCPh9FHA.3132@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | >I have been harassed for over 6 months now by both the stalker Leythos
> and
> | >David. Every post I make gets criticized, just like this one will. I
> | >reported over 3 weeks ago that there was a fix and where to get it.
> That
> | >got ignored because of the flame war started by both David H Lipman and
> | >Leythos the stalker. That link has even been posted at lease 3 times by
> Jim
> | >Byrd MVP. I don't have control over what people choose to read in these
> | >groups but email is different. I have helped well over 111 people with
> that
> | >tool including you. In fact it was your post that said it had worked
> that
> | >started the flood of emails to me. Most had referenced your post in
> their
> | >emails. I don't know if you had noticed or not but the replies you got
> from
> | >your post from both David and especially leythos were condescending and
> | >criticizing you for even sending me an email, they could care less
> about
> | >your problem. They both were pissed because I had a fix that worked.
> Not
> | >once did they ask me for it. Even now if you read David's response he
> is
> | >still trying to discredit me by suggesting I did something wrong by not
> | >posting the link and not giving credit to the author. I contacted the
> | >author after you said it worked and I gave him credit. I also asked him
> if
> | >it was ok to send it to others in need. His answer was yes as long as I
> | >point them to his link in the forum. I have done that. That is how
> Leythos
> | >found it because he was looking for dirt anything he can to discredit
> me
> | >for providing a fix so he stooped so low as to email someone who I sent
> the
> | >fix to and asked them for the name of the program. I'm sure he was
> hoping
> I
> | >would say that it was my program, He was disappointed. Leythos not once
> | >offered any help to anyone on this topic. I am an expert in Spyware and
> an
> | >expert in using Hijackthis. This fix has been posted in my forums for a
> | >while now. I do not post the names of those forums because of the
> Stalkers
> | >mentioned before, however they are well known and get plenty of
> traffic.
> | >Now before Leythos or David contacts the author and starts complaining
> | >about me calling me pcbutts1, my name is Sharon and the author knows me
> by
> | >that name. Feel free to contact him to verify what I have just said.
> | >
> | >
> | >
> | >
> | >
> | >
> | > "Phyllis" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> | > news:eICx3Ug9FHA.1520@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | >>
> | >> "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
> | >> news:OAtLiPe9FHA.808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | >>> From: "ChickInTx" <ChickInTx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | >>>
> | >>> | I gone through this entire thread looking for help and instead
> there
> | >>> are
> | >>> | adults acting as flipping kids. Post your dam help then move on.
> It
> | >>> P***es
> | >>> | me off when people just can't post their link or help they have to
> add
> | >>> other
> | >>> | non-important crap. I spent 30 minutes looking for something that
> | >>> will help
> | >>> | and instead I was reading a soap opera betweem grown dam men.
> | >>> |
> | >>> | NOW- I need something that will fix this problem David yours did
> not
> | >>> work
> | >>> | plan and simple so I need another suggestion. Can somebody who
> knows
> | >>> what
> | >>> | they are doing and that is a grown-up like myself help me? I do
> not
> | >>> want to
> | >>> | deal with anybody that acts like they are 2. And just give me the
> | >>> help not
> | >>> | and explanation how you hate this person, this person is trying to
> | >>> shut you
> | >>> | down, or how so and so's code/programs/whatever does not work.
> | >>> |
> | >>> | Thanks in advance
> | >>> |
> | >>> | "ernest" wrote:
> | >>> |
> | >>>
> | >>> Sorry Ernest that my utility didn't work. There is no reason to
> have
> to
> | >>> send email to
> | >>> anybody to get the following utility.
> | >>>
> | >>> Adware-Virtumundo Removal Tool v1.2
> | >>>
> | >>> http://secured2k.home.comcast.net/tools/VirtumundoBeGone.exe
> | >>>
> | >>> secured2K is the author and you can get his tool from the above URL.
> | >>>
> | >>> --
> | >>> Dave
> | >>> http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
> | >>> http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm
> | >>>
> | >>>
> | >> If this link was known, why wasn't it posted at the VERY beginning of
> | >> this mess. That is the tool that will clean WinFixer. Does the
> author
> | >> not frequent the newsgroups to offer his help, and in turn get the
> credit
> | >> for it? Thanks for finally posting the fix.
> | >>
> | >
> | >
> |
> |
>
>


.