Re: Norton vs "?"
From: Galen (galennews_at_gmail.com)
Date: 10/10/05
- Previous message: Phil Weldon: "Re: Norton vs "?""
- In reply to: Film Fan: "Re: Norton vs "?""
- Next in thread: Panda_man: "Re: Norton vs "?""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 03:29:58 -0400
In news:kfCdneM8LecsmdfeRVn-gw@adelphia.com,
Film Fan <film_fan_69NO_SPAM@yahoo.com> had this to say:
My reply is at the bottom of your sent message:
> Okay.
>
> I would like to try something else.
>
> I want to feel the difference. But, I want something that WILL WORK
> when it comes to viruses and updates.
>
> I might not feel the resource lags because I only use my machine for
> graphics and html, not games.
>
> Any AV program suggestions?
>
>
> "Panda_man" <Pandaman@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:FA5A63A1-3F0F-44D9-9AAA-B31E6BF3012D@microsoft.com...
>> Norton antivirus and any other security Symantec products has many
>> disadvantages:
>> 1.Live Update - used from many people and from you,of course,offers
>> updates
>> only ONCE a week which is critical for new viruses like Sasser
>> ,Zotob,Sober
>> critical.
>>
>> 2.Norton always creates too much files and folders and reg keys and
>> it isn't
>> possible to be cleaned withouth something else.I mean it is possible
>> but need
>> time and special expert skills in "How to clean a computer after
>> Norton" Norton's files are so much that even a malware creates less.
>>
>> 3.Symantec's tech support is terrible.They never do not know why
>> something has happended
>>
>> 4.In my opinion Norton is bad in dealing with Trojans (this is my
>> personal opinion)
>> I think so, because I have helped many people but nowhere Norton
>> helped with dealing with trojans
>>
>> 5.Please read this post and you'll see what kind of problem can
>> Norton create:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.security.virus/browse_thread/thread/ee04b0b9a2b1e661/2766975658608580?lnk=st&q=norton+av+2005+(in+Microsoft)&rnum=5&hl=en#2766975658608580
>>
>> It is being discussed in the group you are posting to.
>>
>>
>> At the end I would recommend you to have one of these better than
>> Norton things:
>>
>> Panda Titanium (at about $ 40 a year)
>> http://www.pandasoftware.com
>> http://www.pandasoftware.com/virus_info/truprevent.htm
>> http://www.pandasoftware.com/about_panda/technology
>>
>> or
>> F-prot AV + Panda TruPrevent ( at about $ 60 a year)
>>
>> http://www.f-prot.com/products/home_use/win/
>> http://www.pandasoftware.com/virus_info/truprevent.htm
>>
>>
>> You can get trials and learn why they are better.
>>
>> Panda_man
>> " Let's beat malware black and blue "
>> " No new epidemics of all kind of malware -> Panda TruPrevent "
>>
>> "Film Fan" wrote:
>>
>>> I've used NAV for years and have had no bad results. It's saved my
>>> ass on several occasions.
>>>
>>> Why is everyone so down on NAV?
>>>
>>> What is better?
>>>
>>> If I get a good answer, I will switch to something else.
>>>
>>> Suggestions?
>>>
>>> R.D.
I highly recommend taking a look at KAV - http://www.kaspersky.com
Some free alternatives:
Malware Cleaners and Repair :
http://kgiii.info/windows/all/general/malwarefix.html
Galen
-- Galen - MS MVP - Windows (Shell/User & IE) "You know that a conjurer gets no credit when once he has explained his trick; and if I show you too much of my method of working, you will come to the conclusion that I am a very ordinary individual after all." Sherlock Holmes
- Previous message: Phil Weldon: "Re: Norton vs "?""
- In reply to: Film Fan: "Re: Norton vs "?""
- Next in thread: Panda_man: "Re: Norton vs "?""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|