Re: Norton vs "?"
From: Phil Weldon (notdiscosed_at_example.com)
Date: 10/10/05
- Previous message: Film Fan: "Re: Norton vs "?""
- In reply to: Panda_man: "RE: Norton vs "?""
- Next in thread: Panda_man: "Re: Norton vs "?""
- Reply: Panda_man: "Re: Norton vs "?""
- Reply: Diane M.: "Re: Norton vs "?""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 06:11:28 GMT
Oddly, I am offered 'Live Update' every two days on average.
Do you suppose it has anything to do with using Norton Antivirus as a part
of SystemWorks? Or have you not used Norton Antivirus lately?
As for why use Norton Antivirus, with careful timing, the price is right;
$0.00 US.
Phil Weldon
"Panda_man" <Pandaman@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FA5A63A1-3F0F-44D9-9AAA-B31E6BF3012D@microsoft.com...
| Norton antivirus and any other security Symantec products has many
| disadvantages:
| 1.Live Update - used from many people and from you,of course,offers
updates
| only ONCE a week which is critical for new viruses like Sasser
,Zotob,Sober
| critical.
|
| 2.Norton always creates too much files and folders and reg keys and it
isn't
| possible to be cleaned withouth something else.I mean it is possible but
need
| time and special expert skills in "How to clean a computer after Norton"
| Norton's files are so much that even a malware creates less.
|
| 3.Symantec's tech support is terrible.They never do not know why something
| has happended
|
| 4.In my opinion Norton is bad in dealing with Trojans (this is my personal
| opinion)
| I think so, because I have helped many people but nowhere Norton helped
| with dealing with trojans
|
| 5.Please read this post and you'll see what kind of problem can Norton
create:
|
http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.security.virus/browse_thread/thread/ee04b0b9a2b1e661/2766975658608580?lnk=st&q=norton+av+2005+(in+Microsoft)&rnum=5&hl=en#2766975658608580
|
| It is being discussed in the group you are posting to.
|
|
| At the end I would recommend you to have one of these better than Norton
| things:
|
| Panda Titanium (at about $ 40 a year)
| http://www.pandasoftware.com
| http://www.pandasoftware.com/virus_info/truprevent.htm
| http://www.pandasoftware.com/about_panda/technology
|
| or
| F-prot AV + Panda TruPrevent ( at about $ 60 a year)
|
| http://www.f-prot.com/products/home_use/win/
| http://www.pandasoftware.com/virus_info/truprevent.htm
|
|
| You can get trials and learn why they are better.
|
| Panda_man
| " Let's beat malware black and blue "
| " No new epidemics of all kind of malware -> Panda TruPrevent "
|
| "Film Fan" wrote:
|
| > I've used NAV for years and have had no bad results. It's saved my ass
on
| > several occasions.
| >
| > Why is everyone so down on NAV?
| >
| > What is better?
| >
| > If I get a good answer, I will switch to something else.
| >
| > Suggestions?
| >
| > R.D.
| >
| >
| >
- Previous message: Film Fan: "Re: Norton vs "?""
- In reply to: Panda_man: "RE: Norton vs "?""
- Next in thread: Panda_man: "Re: Norton vs "?""
- Reply: Panda_man: "Re: Norton vs "?""
- Reply: Diane M.: "Re: Norton vs "?""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|