Re: Free AV
From: Bigbruva (Richardh_at_dontusethis.ws)
Date: 09/27/05
- Previous message: David H. Lipman: "Re: Trojan.PWS.Bancos.142"
- In reply to: Subratam: "Re: Free AV"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:45:03 -0700
Thanks Subratam this is good information, so the recommendation is more to
do with the Anti-malware applications abilities to detect new attacks, which
would then leave the firewall as the only line of defense to trap an new
outgoing malware call, than it is a problem with Windows Firewall directly.
This is just the reasoned and logical information that gets lost in the
"Windows Firewall is cr*p" type comments I see so often.
I also agree that it is only a matter of time before Microsoft step up to
the mark and fix this issue in one care product, or another ;-)
BB
"Subratam" <Subratam@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:54E2B5AE-B086-4ED8-B8D8-D7622E9ED72D@microsoft.com...
> Hi Bigbruva :) ,
>
> Windows Firewall does not restrict outgoing traffic from your computer or
> restrict applications from using your Internet connection. This means that
> if
> you have a virus , Windows Firewall will allow your applications to send
> data
> to the Internet without your permission.
> To rely completely on the SP2 firewall, you'd need to be absolutely
> certain
> that your computer harbors no intruders already-no unknown programs
> downloaded earlier that might be dialing out, no viruses, worms or
> Trojans.
> In that case, blocking inbound traffic would be enough. The problem is
> that
> spyware is developing faster than any one program can catch it. So the
> chances of starting with and maintaining an absolutely intruder-free
> computer
> are not very great.
> The best firewalls not only block incoming traffic, but monitor Internet
> activity initiated from your computer as well. This enables them to catch
> intruders that have been planted in your computer, trying to pass personal
> information and files to a Web site. This provides an extra margin of
> safety .
> Saying that , Microsoft already been aware of it and they are not sitting
> quietly.
>
> Regards
> --
> Microsoft MVP Windows-Security 2005
>
>
> "Bigbruva" wrote:
>
>> Hi Subtratam, as you are an MVP, I am interested that you recommend
>> replacing the Windows Firewall. I hear this a lot, from many sources, and
>> understand the issues about its limitations when compared to a fully
>> featured firewall solution. My question is, do you have any specific
>> examples of attacks that have successfully bypassed an active Windows
>> Firewall? (Note: 897663 doesn't count as no attack has used this)
>>
>> I don't want to start a firestorm, I am simply interested to understand
>> why
>> Windows Firewall has such a bad reputation. If you will forgive the
>> analogy,
>> it may not be a "Ferrari F40" but it is a good "BMW Mini" and, IMHO, most
>> people don't need Ferrari's (especially people like my Mum and Dad ;-)
>>
>> If a user is really "interested" in PC security or is looking to share
>> Internet services then I agree they should upgrade to a more featured
>> product, hence the reason the "Silver Medal" solution
>> (www.windowsdefender.com/silver_protection.htm) does this. However, if
>> you
>> are looking for a simple "set it, forget it" tool to improve your systems
>> security with the minimum complexity, I stick by my recommendation of
>> Windows Firewall, unless I have missed a security vulnerability somewhere
>> of
>> course, in which case I'll update the "Bronze Medal" solution on the
>> site.
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> BB
>>
>> "Subratam" <Subratam@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:E942F0B4-780E-4BF5-BD09-EC7AAE356F8D@microsoft.com...
>> > Just a few points here if I may say :) , Avast , Etrust , AVG are real
>> > quality free AntiViruses of which I will also suggest to go for Avast.
>> > Regarding Firewall , I dont recommend Windows firewall rather disabling
>> > it
>> > and go for much better and free firewall like Sygate . Kerio is
>> > discontinueing its free firewall service
>> > http://forums.kerio.com/index.php?t=msg&th=7040 and most others giving
>> > free
>> > "trials" . Zonealarm is good ... but IMO , it uses a lot of resources .
>> > Prevx
>> > is a good tool to be tried out too which provides layered protection.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > --
>> > Microsoft MVP Windows-Security 2005
>> >
>> >
>> > "Jim Macklin" wrote:
>> >
>> >> ZA seems to be much easier to configure for permissions than
>> >> XPs firewall, maybe that because I began using ZA years ago,
>> >> before XP was released.
>> >>
>> >> BTW, just did an ZA update to 6.0.667.000 and noticed a
>> >> problem with the popup message window. The Allow and deny
>> >> buttons are aligned such that the deny button is only
>> >> partially visible at the right edge of the window. This is
>> >> on both my W98 and XP computer. The download was done on
>> >> each computer. I have sent ZLabs a notice (w screen cap).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
>> >> But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
>> >> some support
>> >> http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "Bigbruva" <Richardh@dontusethis.ws> wrote in message
>> >> news:uj$CuPduFHA.444@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>> >> |I agree that Zone Alarm is a great product, in fact the
>> >> Gold version of this
>> >> | guide will use Zone Alarm Pro - once I get the time to
>> >> finish the guide!
>> >> |
>> >> | However the aim of the Bronze setup was to make the
>> >> installation and
>> >> | configurations as simple as possible and, as the, Windows
>> >> Firewall is part
>> >> | of SP2 (which most home users will have installed) this
>> >> was the easiest to
>> >> | setup. For the majority of home users the Windows Firewall
>> >> is sufficient
>> >> | IMO, even if it's features are rather limited.
>> >> |
>> >> | BB
>> >> |
>> >> |
>> >> | "Jim Macklin" <p51mustang[threeX12]@xxxhotmail.calm> wrote
>> >> in message
>> >> | news:%23vB2sPVuFHA.2568@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>> >> | > AVAST works well, as does As-Aware SE, but the free Zone
>> >> | > Alarm firewall is more functional than the Windows
>> >> firewall
>> >> | > since it monitors in and outbound traffic and has a much
>> >> | > easier interface.
>> >> | >
>> >> | >
>> >> | > --
>> >> | > The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
>> >> | > But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
>> >> | > some support
>> >> | > http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
>> >> | >
>> >> | >
>> >> | >
>> >> | > "Bigbruva" <Richardh@dontusethis.ws> wrote in message
>> >> | > news:OhEMB%23UuFHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>> >> | > | Hi Catamount
>> >> | > |
>> >> | > | I have a step-by-step guide for a free Antivirus and
>> >> | > Anti-spyware setup on
>> >> | > | my site at:
>> >> | > |
>> >> | > | http://www.windowsdefender.com/bronze_protection.htm
>> >> | > |
>> >> | > | This setup uses Avast!, Ad-Aware SE Personal, and
>> >> Windows
>> >> | > Firewall.
>> >> | > |
>> >> | > | HTH
>> >> | > |
>> >> | > | BB
>> >> | > |
>> >> | > | "Catamount" <Nope@spam.no> wrote in message
>> >> | > | news:%23%238n0AJuFHA.3188@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> >> | > | >I am looking for a list of free antivirus and
>> >> firewall
>> >> | > software. I am
>> >> | > | >trying to create a list for a project to get people
>> >> who
>> >> | > don't have the
>> >> | > | >money for the high end AV software to still get
>> >> | > protection. Anyone wanna
>> >> | > | >help little-ole-me?
>> >> | > |
>> >> | > |
>> >> | >
>> >> | >
>> >> |
>> >> |
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
- Previous message: David H. Lipman: "Re: Trojan.PWS.Bancos.142"
- In reply to: Subratam: "Re: Free AV"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]