Re: What good is virus detection....
From: David H. Lipman (DLipman~nospam~_at_Verizon.Net)
Date: 04/22/05
- Next message: Jim Macklin: "Re: What good is virus detection...."
- Previous message: David H. Lipman: "Re: What good is virus detection...."
- In reply to: What's in a Name?: "Re: What good is virus detection...."
- Next in thread: David H. Lipman: "Re: What good is virus detection...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:18:36 -0400
From: "What's in a Name?" <spamthis@nomail.afraid.org>
| David-
| I should have looked closer at your post.I would have seen the dreaded
| temp\IE6 entry
| lol -I used firefox and got no warnings-go figure
| -max
|
| --
| Virus Removal Instructions: http://home.neo.rr.com/manna4u/
| You can find my e-mail address on my pages.
| This message is virus free as far as I can tell.
I posted my reply, then I saw this reply ;-)
There is too much of a time delay on the MS News Server -- Oh well...
-- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm
- Next message: Jim Macklin: "Re: What good is virus detection...."
- Previous message: David H. Lipman: "Re: What good is virus detection...."
- In reply to: What's in a Name?: "Re: What good is virus detection...."
- Next in thread: David H. Lipman: "Re: What good is virus detection...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
