Re: Java/ByteVerify a Trojan
From: MAP (MAP_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 09/19/04
- Next message: David H. Lipman: "Re: Java/ByteVerify a Trojan"
- Previous message: David H. Lipman: "Re: Java/ByteVerify a Trojan"
- In reply to: David H. Lipman: "Re: Java/ByteVerify a Trojan"
- Next in thread: David H. Lipman: "Re: Java/ByteVerify a Trojan"
- Reply: David H. Lipman: "Re: Java/ByteVerify a Trojan"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 20:43:01 -0700
Patching the vulnerability?
Doesn't this require one to know what version he is using? Which is why I
asked in the first place.
Except for using a good A/V of course.
"David H. Lipman" wrote:
> Patching the vulnerability and keeping his AV application up-to-date with On Access scanning
> enabled is what will keep the OP from being re-infected. Like I previously stated, this
> goes back to 4/'03.
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-011.mspx
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> "MAP" <MAP@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:8B0DDB07-DAA3-4277-9DB6-7DF20B6DAECF@microsoft.com...
> | A good responce not only will help the poster remove the trojan but will
> | also help him to prevent reinfection tomorrow! In which case the type of Java
> | he is using
> | is vey relevant.What's the point of removing it if he just gets infected
> | again in a few days?
>
>
>
- Next message: David H. Lipman: "Re: Java/ByteVerify a Trojan"
- Previous message: David H. Lipman: "Re: Java/ByteVerify a Trojan"
- In reply to: David H. Lipman: "Re: Java/ByteVerify a Trojan"
- Next in thread: David H. Lipman: "Re: Java/ByteVerify a Trojan"
- Reply: David H. Lipman: "Re: Java/ByteVerify a Trojan"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|