Re: FIREWALL QUESTION
From: Bruce Chambers (bruce_a_chambers_at_h0tmail.com)
Date: 08/07/04
- Next message: Bruce Chambers: "Re: adware and spyware pls help"
- Previous message: David H. Lipman: "Re: Safety and Reliability of PC Piitspot?"
- In reply to: HDM: "FIREWALL QUESTION"
- Next in thread: Dannie: "Re: FIREWALL QUESTION"
- Reply: Dannie: "Re: FIREWALL QUESTION"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 07:00:26 -0600
Greetings --
The "next generation" Windows Firewall included with SP2, while
vastly superior to the original ICF in terms of visibility, usability
and configurability, is still rather lacking, as a solid security
component. It still can't supplant 3rd-party solutions, nor is it
intended to do so; rather, it's intended to complement them.
Bruce Chambers
-- Help us help you: http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having both at once. - RAH "HDM" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:1c9101c47c3a$8c55d800$a601280a@phx.gbl... > I am currently running a up to date Firewall. Downloading > this new Microsoft XP update Pack 2... will that > intervere with my current running firewall?
- Next message: Bruce Chambers: "Re: adware and spyware pls help"
- Previous message: David H. Lipman: "Re: Safety and Reliability of PC Piitspot?"
- In reply to: HDM: "FIREWALL QUESTION"
- Next in thread: Dannie: "Re: FIREWALL QUESTION"
- Reply: Dannie: "Re: FIREWALL QUESTION"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]