Re: is lavasoft recommended
From: Sandi - Microsoft MVP (sandi_hardmeier_at_mvps.org)
Date: 05/25/04
- Next message: Sandi - Microsoft MVP: "Re: is lavasoft recommended"
- Previous message: just4sallee_at_hotmail.com: "WToolsA"
- In reply to: Phil Weldon: "Re: is lavasoft recommended"
- Next in thread: Sandi - Microsoft MVP: "Re: is lavasoft recommended"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 19:49:25 +0800
Thanks Phil :o)
-- Hyperlinks are used to ensure advice remains current _______________________________________ Sandi - Microsoft MVP since 1999 (IE/OE) http://inetexplorer.mvps.org/ Phil Weldon wrote: > Well, I know it is difficult to provide information for many different > levels of user in one document. Hyperlinks might be one way out, but > the need to drill down through multiple levels of URL's and other > hyperlinks is daunting to many who appeal in this newsgroup. The > first technical writing I did preceeded introduction of the IBM > Selectic, and went through 26 versions in attempt to reach its > audience in a straightforward and unambiguous manner (and this was > for an operating system that was less than 8 K.) However, where > computers are concerned, there are so many details and choices that > straightforward wars with unambiguous. > > With the straightforward/unambiguous dichotomy in mind - > > rather than suggest "you must shut down as many suspicious processes > as possible", consider this - > ____ > Start the system without any items in the 'Startup' folder, then use > 'TaskManager' to shut down all unnecessary processes. > ____ > > That is a much less ambiguous directive since it needs no 'special' > knowledge or proceedures. It can be followed even in absence of > 'informed judgement' by using trial-trial-and-error. Given an NT > base operating system, you will not be allowed to shut down system > critical processes, and not allow access to some other processes. In > fact, this inability to shut down a particular process probably > applies to all the really hardy mal-ware, which calls into question > this whole line of advice. > > Despite the question of the whole line of advice, as an example I > provide the following. > ..... > Expansion on the simple sentence "Start the system without any items > in the 'Startup' folder, then use 'TaskManager' to shut down all > unnecessary processes." must be made to account for different > operating systems. Initial steps must be added (like 'disconnect from > the internet and any other > network.) There is no clear and unambiguous definition of "suspicious > processes" other than a long, yet still qualifed, explict and > exhaustive list. > ..... > And finally, "linking to it" is part of this problem. > > "Sandi - Microsoft MVP" <sandi_hardmeier@mvps.org> wrote in message > news:%23Z3HFqZQEHA.3660@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... >> Phil, >> >> Write something better, publish it and we'll link to it. >> >> -- >> Hyperlinks are used to ensure advice remains current >> _______________________________________ >> Sandi - Microsoft MVP since 1999 (IE/OE) >> http://inetexplorer.mvps.org/ >> >> >> >> >> Phil Weldon wrote: >>> No, and THAT link further makes my point about handwaving and >>> mirrors. It is large, and does not speak directly and clearly to >>> 'How to tell "suspect processes"'. If you don't believe me, try >>> actually reading the information at the link >>> http://www2.whidbey.com/djdenham/Uncheck.htm . >>> >>> >>> "Sandi - Microsoft MVP" <sandi_hardmeier@mvps.org> wrote in message >>> news:%23lfOacXQEHA.2248@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... >>>> Phil Weldon wrote: >>>>> You know, I have doubts about the usefulness of the information at >>>>> that URL. It seems use a lot of hand-waving and mirrors to >>>>> completly confuse the issue. To whit, "and you must shut down as >>>>> many suspect processes as possible"; give me a break. How to >>>>> tell "suspect processes" would be a useful contribution, but I >>>>> guess that would take up too much space. >>>> >>>> How to tell suspect processes? Did you miss this bit? >>>> >>>> Disable suspect processes using MSCONFIG before booting into safe >>>> mode. Use the information at the URL below as a guide: >>>> http://www2.whidbey.com/djdenham/Uncheck.htm >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Hyperlinks are used to ensure advice remains current >>>> _______________________________________ >>>> Sandi - Microsoft MVP since 1999 (IE/OE) >>>> http://inetexplorer.mvps.org/
- Next message: Sandi - Microsoft MVP: "Re: is lavasoft recommended"
- Previous message: just4sallee_at_hotmail.com: "WToolsA"
- In reply to: Phil Weldon: "Re: is lavasoft recommended"
- Next in thread: Sandi - Microsoft MVP: "Re: is lavasoft recommended"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]