Re: Dual boot and virus
From: Jim Macklin (p51mustang[threeX12)
Date: 05/02/04
- Next message: Bob: "Re: Matteo for "Trafton""
- Previous message: Torgeir Bakken \(MVP\): "Re: Security Update for Windows XP (KB835732)"
- In reply to: Crusty \(-: Old B_at_stard :-\): "Re: Dual boot and virus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 16:28:20 -0500
It does seem that if the data exists, that it can be found,
just not by a script kiddie.
I'm not a hacker or a programmer, but I can see that a
program such as Outlook Express can be infected even if it
isn't running and you're using Mozilla, so it would seem
that running one OS would still leave other inactive OS
vulnerable to infection.
-- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. "Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-)" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%23g%239EIHMEHA.2532@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... | Seeing as how System Commander runs in DOS and then drops out of the picture | as the chosen system boots (the DOS partition is also hidden when the O/S is | up and running) I would think that it can not happen. | | Of course, I have been wrong before (-: | | -- | Regards: | | Richard Urban | | aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-) | | "Jim Macklin" <p51mustang[threeX12]@xxxhotmail.calm> wrote in message | news:%23jEdaBHMEHA.1468@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... | > Sounds good, but if the drive is merely hidden, couldn't | > some sharp virus writer use parts of the System Commander or | > Partition Magic to see and then infect all install drives | > and OS? | > | > | > -- | > The people think the Constitution protects their rights; | > But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. | > | > | > "Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-)" | > <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in message | > news:%23A0meHFMEHA.340@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... | > | Jim, | > | | > | It would depend upon the methodology used to dual boot. | > | | > | If the 2nd O/S is installed in a logical partition, and is | > visible when the | > | 1st operating system is booted up, then it is possible for | > the 2nd operating | > | system to be hurt by a virus that corrupts say, all .exe | > files on the | > | drives. | > | | > | In my case, I use System Commander Boot Manager and I | > have each of my | > | operating systems on a primary partition. The booted | > partition is active and | > | visible. The other primary system partitions are inactive | > and hidden. There | > | is no way that a virus on one system can touch the other | > operating systems. | > | | > | -- | > | Regards: | > | | > | Richard Urban | > | | > | aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-) | > | | > | "Jim Macklin" <p51mustang[threeX12]@xxxhotmail.calm> wrote | > in message | > | news:%23NfENsEMEHA.1340@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... | > | >I have read several posts by others, describing their | > | > systems and asking about viruses and worms. Some have | > said | > | > they don't use certain OS to surf the web. | > | > | > | > My question, Is the active OS the only place for | > infection, | > | > or can a virus infect any or all of the installed OSs in | > a | > | > multi-boot system? | > | > | > | > If so, would running an older, unpatched version of W95 | > or | > | > 98 leave holes in a fully patched W XP system? | > | > | > | > Is there anything such as a firewall between systems on | > a | > | > local disk? | > | > | > | > | > | > -- | > | > The people think the Constitution protects their rights; | > | > But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | | > | | > | > | |
- Next message: Bob: "Re: Matteo for "Trafton""
- Previous message: Torgeir Bakken \(MVP\): "Re: Security Update for Windows XP (KB835732)"
- In reply to: Crusty \(-: Old B_at_stard :-\): "Re: Dual boot and virus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|