Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?
From: Dmitriy Kopnichev (kopn_at_hotbox.ruDELETE)
Date: 04/30/04
- Next message: Tom R: "Re: ???.beagle VIRUS.."
- Previous message: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- In reply to: David Candy: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Next in thread: Phil Weldon: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:56:14 +0400
David! You are just a dastard! Phil could smash your nose if you were near
him!
"David Candy" <david@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:uGrM1IlLEHA.556@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Well Mr pweldon@mindspring.com (just thought I'd let the spam harvesters
harvest) I've been here for years, you occasionally for 18 months or so. How
about you go.
-- ---------------------------------------------------------- And the band played .... http://www.livejournal.com/users/aldon/74121.html "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message news:Xzhkc.17872$e4.17729@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... > As I said, unsupported, untrue, inflamatory, and actionable. And, well, why > don't you confine yourself to another, more appropriate forum? > > -- > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom > For communication, > replace "at" with the 'at sign' > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." > replace "dot" with "." > > > "David Candy" <david@mvps.org> wrote in message > news:eXbW8jkLEHA.1612@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > Let me see, can't spell gaol, doesn't understand ethics by your support of > someone breaking rules and threatening his company's infrastructure, and you > are on pacific time with a US ISP so probably a yank, if so you bear > collective responsibility for the war crime in Iraq - pay taxes to burn > children to death do you. Have you used your right to bear arms to change to > a non criminal government. War criminal fits. It certainly defamatory but > the defence of truth will suffice I think and make it non actionable. You > would certainly make it through the jury stage of a trial but it would be > tossed out at the judge stage of the trial (which is the main part). > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------- > And the band played .... > http://www.livejournal.com/users/aldon/74121.html > "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message > news:cJgkc.17804$e4.11247@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > Yes, unsupported: > > > > A. You refered to Dmitriy Kopnichev with the statement "You know that what > > you want is illegal with 5 years gaol (jail if you can't spell) time. If I > > help I'm conspiring with you. Take the hint and stop trying to act > > illegally." Demonstrably untrue as you and Dmitriy Kopnichev live and > work > > in completely different countries with unrelated legal systems. > > > > > > B. You referred to me as "Another ethically challenged, spelling retarded, > > war criminal yank". That statement is at best that is unsupported and > > reckless; at worst defamatory and actionable. > > > > > > -- > > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom > > For communication, > > replace "at" with the 'at sign' > > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." > > replace "dot" with "." > > > > "David Candy" <david@mvps.org> wrote in message > > news:eYbwPohLEHA.2148@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > Unsupported? > > > > > > Dmitriy Kopnichev wrote: > > > Yes. He set the restriction. But I want to overcome it. > > Source: > > news:\\msnews.microsoft.com\#LDFnJELEHA.1612@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl > > > > -- > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > And the band played .... > > http://www.livejournal.com/users/aldon/74121.html > > "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message > > news:nvbkc.17448$e4.7925@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > > Free with your unsupported accusations aren't you. On balance, I'd say > > > you're not fitted to be a gate-keeper. > > > > > > -- > > > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom > > > For communication, > > > replace "at" with the 'at sign' > > > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." > > > replace "dot" with "." > > > > > > > > > "David Candy" <david@mvps.org> wrote in message > > > news:O9yBxBhLEHA.2576@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > > Well Dimitry been trying to get round his admin for years. He asks > > questions > > > here that only his admin knows the answer too. He did it when he was a > 98 > > > user, a ME user, and now as an XP user. He usually withholds as much > > > information as possible. This is the first time he's admitted he is > > engaging > > > in unethical behaviour though I've suspected for years. > > > > > > -- > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > And the band played .... > > > http://www.livejournal.com/users/aldon/74121.html > > > "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message > > > news:cDakc.14230$eZ5.6460@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > > > So far, your posts are inappropriate for any forum listed in the > > headers. > > > > Your thinking is insular, but, then, that is to be expected. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom > > > > For communication, > > > > replace "at" with the 'at sign' > > > > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." > > > > replace "dot" with "." > > > > > > > > > > > > "David Candy" <david@mvps.org> wrote in message > > > > news:e986zGgLEHA.2976@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > > > Another ethically challenged, spelling retarded, war criminal yank. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > And the band played .... > > > > http://www.livejournal.com/users/aldon/74121.html > > > > "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message > > > > news:5e9kc.14126$eZ5.3023@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > > > > What the hell are you talking about, and where are you talking from, > > and > > > > > what possible connection is there between whatever system of 'law' > > > you're > > > > > babbling about have with whatever system of law is in effect where > > > Dmitriy > > > > > works? And a hell of a lot more people spell jail correctly than > > spell > > > it > > > > > alternately goal. Do you spell fish 'ghoti' also? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom > > > > > For communication, > > > > > replace "at" with the 'at sign' > > > > > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." > > > > > replace "dot" with "." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "David Candy" <david@mvps.org> wrote in message > > > > > news:%23ms7VveLEHA.1340@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > > > > You know that what you want is illegal with 5 years gaol (jail if > you > > > > can't > > > > > spell) time. If I help I'm conspiring with you. Take the hint and > stop > > > > > trying to act illegally. > > > > > > > > > > Ten year prison sentences will apply to the "unauthorised > modification > > > > > of data with intent to cause impairment" and the "unauthorised > > > > > impairment of electronic communication". Meanwhile, a person found > > > > > guilty of "possessing data with intent to commit a computer offence" > > or > > > > > the "producing, supplying or obtaining data with intent to commit a > > > > > computer offence" faces up to three years in prison.=20 > > > > > > > > > > Up to two years in prison awaits anyone found guilty of > "unauthorised > > > > > access to or modification of restricted data in a computer" or the > > > > > "unauthorised impairment of data held in computer disk, credit card > or > > > > > other device".=20 > > > > > > > > > > Turning off virus checking that is enforced is "unauthorised > > > modification > > > > > of data [ie the setting] with intent to cause impairment" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > And the band played .... > > > > > http://www.livejournal.com/users/aldon/74121.html > > > > > "Dmitriy Kopnichev" <kopn@hotbox.ruDELETE> wrote in message > > > > > news:eS4MPXeLEHA.268@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > > > > > It's not possible. > > > > > > "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message > > > > > > news:FA5kc.13973$eZ5.11479@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > > > > > > Is it possible for you at your level of system access to exclude > > > > certain > > > > > > > file types from scanning? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom > > > > > > > For communication, > > > > > > > replace "at" with the 'at sign' > > > > > > > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." > > > > > > > replace "dot" with "." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Next message: Tom R: "Re: ???.beagle VIRUS.."
- Previous message: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- In reply to: David Candy: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Next in thread: Phil Weldon: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|