Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?
From: Phil Weldon (notdisclosed_at_example.com)
Date: 04/29/04
- Previous message: Phil Weldon: "Re: What virus is spreading my domain name?"
- In reply to: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Next in thread: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Reply: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:28:39 GMT
I use Windows 2000 Professional and Windows 2000 Professional, and I use the
'Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional Resource Kit', a 3 kilogram book and
CD-ROM that is a good source of answers for such questions. I'm sure the
'Windows XP Professional Resource Kit' is just as good. The book I have has
165 pages on monitoring and analyzing performance.
There are about 20 columns selectable in 'Task Manager', and the 'Process
Viewer' (Pviewer.exe) is also useful.
Windows XP 'Help' should give information on how to use performance counters
for trouble shooting bottlenecks.
-- Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom For communication, replace "at" with the 'at sign' replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." replace "dot" with "." "Dmitriy Kopnichev" <kopn@hotbox.ruDELETE> wrote in message news:uaGKd3SLEHA.2068@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > What Columns to use to find out where the bottleneck is? How to know by > numbers in the Column where the bottleneck is? > "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message > news:cIOjc.16060$e4.4579@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > Sorry for the typo. The I/O bandwidth should be 1 Mbit per second, not 1 > > MByte per second. The Amdahl/Case Rule is a 'rule of thumb' like 'Moore's > > Law, and only approximate. A 'Northwood' 1.8 GHz Pentium might have 2,400 > > MIPS, indicating 2.4 GBytes memory and 2.4 GBits I/O bandwidth by the > > Amdahl/Case Rule. The I/O bandwidth for a 32-bit, 33 MHz PCI bus would be > > 32 X 33 MHz ~= 1 GBit/second. The I/O bandwidth for a 32-bit 66 MHz X 8 > AGP > > bus would be ~= 16 GBit/second, but much of the AGP bus bandwidth is > unused > > for most applications. A 66 MHz 64-bit PCI bus is available on server > > motherboards and a faster replacement for the PCI bus is soon to appear in > > general motherboards; server applications approach the 1 MByte per MIPS > > ratio, and for general workstation use, the 1 MByte per MIPS ratio is > > approached if the swap file is included. > > > > I suggest you use the performance data available in 'Task Manager' (select > > 'Processes', 'View', 'Select Columns') to find out where your bottleneck > is. > > > > -- > > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom > > For communication, > > replace "at" with the 'at sign' > > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." > > replace "dot" with "." > > > > > > "Phil Weldon" <notdisclosed@example.com> wrote in message > > news:YRxjc.15038$e4.58@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > > The request might have something to do with CPU resources. What might > not > > > be noticed with a 3 GHz Pentium 4 in a workstation might be very > noticable > > > if the CPU can't keep up with disk bandwidth. Without knowing that keep > > > piece of information... Amdahl/Case Rule: A balanced computer system > > needs > > > about 1 MByte of memory and 1 MByte per second of I/O bandwidth per MIPS > > of > > > CPU performance. > > > > > > -- > > > Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom > > > For communication, > > > replace "at" with the 'at sign' > > > replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." > > > replace "dot" with "." > > > > > > > > > "Bill Sanderson" <Bill_Sanderson@msn.com.plugh.org> wrote in message > > > news:Oh$p5iHLEHA.2660@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > > > Agreed. > > > > > > > > I don't think this is a universal issue with Symantec Corporate--my > > > clients > > > > haven't run into it--so I suspect this is fixable. Turning off the > scan > > > > should be an absolute last resort, although reasonable for testing. > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Previous message: Phil Weldon: "Re: What virus is spreading my domain name?"
- In reply to: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Next in thread: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Reply: Dmitriy Kopnichev: "Re: How to turn off the "File System Real-time Protection" in Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]