Re: Hardware vs Software
From: Phil Weldon (notdisclosed_at_example.com)
Date: 04/21/04
- Next message: Bruce Chambers: "Re: Microsoft e-mail?????????"
- Previous message: brad: "opaserv"
- In reply to: Linda B: "Re: Hardware vs Software"
- Next in thread: sgopus: "Re: Hardware vs Software"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 01:17:33 GMT
I did read all your posts in this thread, and their content is what informed
my reply.
-- Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom For communication, replace "at" with the 'at sign' replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." replace "dot" with "." "Linda B" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:1d3301c42728$10921240$a101280a@phx.gbl... > > Yeah, guy, I don't use passwords. Give me a break. > > If you would have bothered to have read any of the other > posts you would have found that I was never advising > anyone *not* to use AV software, that I am in no way > opposed to it, only that my computer has been running for > four years, nonstop, using only a hardware firewall for > protection, and I have NEVER had any problems (compared, > incidentally, to *countless* posts on this group from > people with all kinds of software "protection" and who run > into problems *constantly*). I was saying that it works > for me, that it's a simple solution, and that I'm > surprised more people don't have similar setups. I'm not > quite certain how to express it any more monosyllabically. > > I've also said that I update my system regularly via > windows update, and that I'm in IT and therefore tend to > keep abreast of such releases as critical vulnerability > patches. I already ran the latest patch from MS (thanks > for caring), and even though I didn't read anything about > the specifics, I would be exceedingly surprised to find > that it could transmit a virus to my computer via my > webmail client. > > Now excuse me... I have to go find my keys. > > >-----Original Message----- > >There is an exploitable vulnerability which contains the > virus in the body > >of the email message, and that does not require that you > use Outlook Express > >as your email program, only that you HAVE Outlook > Express. The > >vulnerability was patched only a week ago in the latest > Microsoft Security > >releases. With an antivirus program running, you have a > chance of detecting > >'virus-like' activity, even if specific definitions have > not yet been > >released. > > > >What, exactly, is your objection to computer security? > Do you use > >passwords, or are they too inconvenient? Do you not lock > your home because > >it is to easy to lose your keys? > > > >-- > >Phil Weldon, pweldonatmindjumpdotcom > >For communication, > >replace "at" with the 'at sign' > >replace "mindjump" with "mindspring." > >replace "dot" with "." > > > >"Linda B" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in > message > >news:1b8b01c4270a$0857bb20$a101280a@phx.gbl... > >> > >> Not using Outlook or OE has been my best protection > >> against this, I suppose, but I've been in computers long > >> enough to know what a virus email looks like. I know > that > >> all it takes is a couple inadvertent mouse clicks, and > >> maybe I should consider myself lucky, but I've never had > >> any problems like this. > >> > >> Maybe I should throw this into the fray as well, while > I'm > >> busy debunking the myth that viruses and spyware are > >> a "problem" -- I hardly ever receive any spam at all at > >> any of my six email accounts (except for my yahoo > >> account). I oftentimes think people just making this > >> stuff up. > >> > >> Don't take me too seriously, I'm really just trying to > get > >> a rise out of you now. ;) > >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >"Linda B" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote > >> >> Why is it whenever people on this NG ask about what > they > >> >> should do to protect themselves from the evils > rampant > >> on > >> >> the Internet, everyone always responds with "install > >> NIS" > >> >> or "install ZoneAlarm"? Always install, install, > >> install! > >> > > >> >You are right. However, I used to think like you as > well > >> until I ran spybot > >> >S&D on my system and it flagged about 300 different > files > >> on my system. The > >> >thing is, most people need to make sure they are > >> protected from what they > >> >might do to themselves by accident as much as what > others > >> might try to do to > >> >them. Routers and hardware firewalls are great, but > they > >> need to be properly > >> >configured otherwise they are of no help. I would > >> recommend a hardware-based > >> >solution as well, but most security software that I > have > >> used is much easier > >> >to configure than hardware-based solutions and it has > >> been my experience, > >> >that the more difficult it is to figure out, the less > >> likely people will be > >> >willing to take the time to set it up properly. > >> > > >> >Plus a router isn't going to save you from a virus if > you > >> get the right one > >> >on your system. All it takes is accidentally clicking > an > >> attachment and > >> >you'll have a huge problem on your hands. > >> > > >> > > >> >. > >> > > > > > > >. > >
- Next message: Bruce Chambers: "Re: Microsoft e-mail?????????"
- Previous message: brad: "opaserv"
- In reply to: Linda B: "Re: Hardware vs Software"
- Next in thread: sgopus: "Re: Hardware vs Software"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|