Re: Norton vs McAfee
From: David H. Lipman (DLipman~nospam~_at_Verizon.Net)
Date: 02/24/04
- Next message: krissy: "Win32/Winshow.51712.dll.Trojan"
- Previous message: steve.kaufman_at_attglobal.net: "boot-up with Trojan virus"
- In reply to: Richard Perry: "Re: Norton vs McAfee"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:19:31 -0500
No. The Application Log on the Alert Manager server would have the most complete data.
Here are two samples of the Centralized Reporting ASCII log...
2/3/2004 12:49 PM Infected enduser C:\Documents and Settings\enduser\Local
Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\RI8LGSFU\ebay[1].htm Exploit-URLSpoof.gen
2/3/2004 12:49 PM Deleted enduser C:\Documents and Settings\enduser\Local
Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\RI8LGSFU\ebay[1].htm Exploit-URLSpoof.gen
2/18/2004 1:31 PM Infected enduser C:\Documents and Settings\enduser\Local
Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\4XIZWX27\body[1].cmd W32/Mydoom.dam
2/18/2004 1:31 PM Deleted enduser C:\Documents and Settings\enduser\Local
Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\4XIZWX27\body[1].cmd W32/Mydoom.dam
The following is a sample of the Application Log on the Alert Manger server...
"Alert Manager Event Log Alert:
The file C:\Documents and Settings\enduser\Local Settings\Temporary Internet
Files\Content.IE5\4XIZWX27\body[1].cmd is infected with W32/Mydoom.dam Known Virus. Unable
to clean the file using the current Scan engine version 4.3.20 DAT version 4.0.4324.(from
enduser_PC IP 192.168.1.10 user DOMAIN\enduser running VirusScan 4.5.1 SP1 OAS) "
Dave
"Richard Perry" <newsgroups@perrysonline.net.no.spam> wrote in message
news:uFYUBwv%23DHA.1452@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
| Dave-
| Thank you so much for your information. I really do appreciate the details
| in which you described your setup. And these ramblings I do appreciate. The
| other ramblings I was referring to were the ones about the inaccuracy of
| information I received from one of my users.
|
| However, after reading all of your post, I come to one conclusion. If I
| wanted to find out what version of software, what dat file is installed, and
| the number of viruses on computer ABC, I would have to scan thru an ASCII
| text file to find that information, correct?
|
| Richard
|
| "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
| news:uChTCoo%23DHA.3808@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
| > Replies are inline.
| > "Richard Perry" <newsgroups@perrysonline.net.nospam> wrote in message
| > news:%23Rz$uJo%23DHA.2524@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
| > | Dave-
| > | I am replying to this message as I do not wish to propagate your other
| > | response to my other post. I am looking for helpful information, not
| > | ramblings.
| > |
| > | However, this post contains a lot of beneficial information and I would
| like
| > | to get more details from you with how you use this product. Your stated
| use
| > | of McAfee is identical to the current implementation that I am working
| in
| > | with one exception. We are deploying v7 on all Windows 2000
| workstations.
| > | However, we are not "pushing" anything to any workstation or server. We
| are
| > | manually installing the software on all workstations, and setting the
| > | software to do an autoupdate on system startup. For the most part, this
| is
| > | covering all of our antivirus needs.
| >
| >
| > Having all the platforms perform an auto-update means more bandwidth use
| to the Internet. I
| > pull the files from the McAfee FTP server and post the files to the
| Server's replication
| > source directory and let the NT Replication Service push the files to all
| NT Domain
| > controllers. This way our satelite office users don't get updates over a
| T1 line but get it
| > from a local BDC server. When PCs are updated, the traffic stays on the
| LAN and never hits
| > the MAN and WAN.
| >
| > By pushing updates I get two results. Guarantees that as users logon to
| the Domain, they
| > will get the updates. The second is Configuration Management. I can push
| changes to the
| > configuration such as new files extensions, EXTRA.DAT files, patches or
| software updates.
| >
| >
| > | I have one major complaint about our current setup. I have no way at the
| > | present time to load a central console and see how many machines are
| > | currently running any version of software, the latest dat file
| installed,
| > | the current engine installed, or the number of viruses caught on any
| > | workstation. Any or all of this information is critical in my mind as it
| > | would help me to identify machines that might be vulnerable, users that
| have
| > | a high number of viruses and can therefore be considered a risk, and
| justify
| > | the latest upgrade to the latest version if necessary (future use).
| >
| >
| > I override the default log files which are store on the local PC. Stupid
| idea ! I created
| > a hidden share and I have all the clients report to the centralized log
| files.. I also use
| > the Centralized Alerter. If a PC gets a hit. All the administrators get
| a NetBIOS Pop-Up
| > on their PC. It indicates the name of the infector, what has been found
| to be infected and
| > the action as well as DAT and ENGINE version.
| >
| >
| > | I have not found that the current version of McAfee Enterprise contains
| the
| > | tools that would allow me to do this. Since you are not only a fan of
| > | McAfee, but also a current user of the software, you are in a good
| position
| > | to point out how I can use the software. Just keep in mind that it is
| not
| > | enough for me to simply deploy the software. I want to report on where
| that
| > | software is and how well it is working.
| > |
| > | Richard
| >
| >
| > By maintaining full control over the clients I guarantee updates, force
| Configuration
| > Control, force centralized reporting and take advantage of centralized
| alerting. Besides
| > events being logged into the the Alert Manager Server's application log, I
| get a ASCII log.
| > I keep a master text file log on a per week basis. For example if a get a
| "hit", I'll create
| > a file called 02-27-2004.log which will contan that weeks logged events I
| also keep a
| > spread*** of all hits. Each row is a different infector. Each column
| is a year. So at
| > the start of the year, the row "JS/IEStart" and all other previouly noted
| viruses are set to
| > zero and the total is zero. If I get a hit of the "JS/IEStart" I note the
| number of hits.
| > By the end of the year I can see the total number of hits and what viruses
| were prevalent
| > that year. the spread*** goes back several years. If you were to ask
| me "how many hits
| > of the "JS/IEStart" I had in 2003" I can tell you as well as the total
| hits of this
| > infector over the years.
| >
| > As to the hidden share I mentioned. Lets assume that collating server is
| called SERVER1. I
| > create a hidden share \\server1\alert$ { when we used to have Win98
| platforms, the share
| > "alert$" was set to be a "Null Session Share" such that a client could
| write to the log
| > files even if there was no authenticated user. As of 12/31/03, no
| Win9x/ME platforms were
| > allowed to exist on our MAN so that Null Session Share capability was
| removed }
| >
| > I have TXT files called...
| >
| > \\server1\alert$\Webdownload.TXT
| > \\server1\alert$\Emailevent.TXT
| > \\server1\alert$\Vshield.TXT
| >
| > for servers...
| >
| > \\server1\alert$\server1_netshield.txt
| > \\server1\alert$\server2_netshield.txt
| > \\server1\alert$\server3_netshield.txt
| >
| > I also create a JOB file that is dropped into the MS tasker. It is given
| a specified user
| > account (called 1145scan) so it can perform the JOB and log the even. At
| 1145am (when the
| > majority of users go to lunch) the workstation performs a mandated scan of
| the platform.
| > This too goes to a log files such as \\server1\alert$\Vshield.TXT
| >
| > My organization "requires" maticulous logging, reporting and a daily scan
| of the desktops.
| >
| > By pushing updates to the workstations, I can over ride McAfees default
| settings t
| > accomplish these task.
| >
| > The solution is simple. I keep a file on the PC whose extension is the
| latest McAfee DAT
| > revision. When I go in tomorrow, I will set a counter in the Kixtart
| script to "327". When
| > my users logon to the PC, the script looks for a file called
| "mcafee_.327". If it exists,
| > the PC has already been updated. If it doesn't, the file "mcafee_.326" is
| erased and the NT
| > Service is stopped. I then copy the SuperDAT (renamed to setup.exe) to a
| local directory.
| > I then execute the SETUP.EXE with the force switch paramenter (setup.exe
| /F). I then import
| > a REG file that is the Configuration Mnagement file. I then restart the
| NT Service and then
| > write the file "mcafee_.327".
| >
| > Advantages, of the above. If I delete the mcafee_.xxx file, I can force
| and update by
| > relogging onto the domain. If I want to change the bahaviour of the
| client, I edit the REG
| > file.
| >
| > In summation, I can't and don't leave things to chance. I force the
| configuration and
| > updating guaranteeing protection and equality of Mcafee AV software on ALL
| my workstations.
| > I over ride the local reporting with Cetralized Reporting and I take
| advantage of
| > Centralized Alerting. I get ASCII log files with which I use to maintain
| historical log
| > records in case of a security audit.
| >
| > I hope you enjoyed the above "ramblings" :-)
| >
| > Dave
| >
| >
|
|
- Next message: krissy: "Win32/Winshow.51712.dll.Trojan"
- Previous message: steve.kaufman_at_attglobal.net: "boot-up with Trojan virus"
- In reply to: Richard Perry: "Re: Norton vs McAfee"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]