Re: 2004 -Microsoft drops 9x support
From: Larry Samuels MS-MVP XP \(Shell/User\) (larry_at_mvps.org)
Date: 12/16/03
- Next message: hege: "Re: Possible Virus Infection"
- Previous message: David H. Lipman: "Re: Viruses in C:\Restore\Temp\*.cpy files that are write protected"
- In reply to: Jupiter Jones [MVP]: "Re: 2004 -Microsoft drops 9x support"
- Next in thread: Robert Moir: "Re: 2004 -Microsoft drops 9x support"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:22:28 -0500
Extended hotfix support for this product will end on 30-Jun-2003. After
16-Jan-2004, this product will be obsolete and assisted support will no
longer be available from Microsoft. Online self-help support will continue
to be available until at least 30-Jun-2006.
-- Larry Samuels MS-MVP (Windows-Shell/User) Associate Expert Unofficial FAQ for Windows Server 2003 at http://home.earthlink.net/~larrysamuels/WS2003FAQ.htm Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message news:u5scU%231wDHA.540@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > Sarah; > The % using Windows 9x has been steadily decreasing since the release > of Windows XP and even earlier with the release of windows 2000. > Fewer and fewer threats affect Windows XP because of the dropping > numbers. > The existing patches will likely be available for a few years, but no > new patches should be expected. > > If a vulnerability appears that you deem unacceptable, you will need > to change operating systems. > > Windows 98SE is about 4 years old, very old in these times of > technology changes > > -- > Jupiter Jones [MVP] > An easier way to read newsgroup messages: > http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/using/newsgroups/setup.asp > http://dts-l.org/index.html > > > "Sarah" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:147b301c3c359$431c2710$a601280a@phx.gbl... > > So what does everyone think will be the effect of > > Microsoft's decision to drop support for Win 9x in 2004 on > > the flood of viruses? I'm wondering if that means that > > there will be enough systems running 9x that become > > infected because there won't be patches for new > > vulnerabilities, that it will create problems (traffic > > from DOS attempts or whatever) for the users of more > > current operating systems. > >
- Next message: hege: "Re: Possible Virus Infection"
- Previous message: David H. Lipman: "Re: Viruses in C:\Restore\Temp\*.cpy files that are write protected"
- In reply to: Jupiter Jones [MVP]: "Re: 2004 -Microsoft drops 9x support"
- Next in thread: Robert Moir: "Re: 2004 -Microsoft drops 9x support"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|