Re: norton anti v
From: Sarah (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 12/14/03
- Next message: Trevor: "Re: W32 Blaster Worm"
- Previous message: David H. Lipman: "Re: virus explanation"
- In reply to: LuckyStrike: "Re: norton anti v"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 19:46:22 -0800
>-----Original Message-----
>Oooooh pardon me..."wise-acres" has upset your
sensibilities.
>
>And what pray tell were you alluding with this little
snip <start/quote> Its
>a little gremlin that sneaks in and changes
>perfectly good spelling to junk.<end/quote>
>
><start/quote>polite differences of opinion to name
calling <end/quote> This
>thread has had all the callings of being snotty right
from the get-go. If
>that which I have quoted you from above is *polite*, I'd
hate to see what
>your vision of impolite is. But then again, I already
have, thinly veiled
>under the pretext of being indignant at a person
who "calls you" on this BS.
>
><start/quote>Do
>> you really think that will help folks understand
differing
>> opinions, do you just enjoy venting, or are you
incapable
>> of communicating without resorting to insults?
<end/quote>
>
>I guess you didn't care for my "differing opinion" then.
But then, this
>*isn't* a forum about peoples differences of opinions;
it's about helping
>people with the issue they ask about. Naturally, had I
agreed with *your*
>opinion, then I would have been welcome, and joined the
ranks of those who
>enjoy being "smart". In disagreeing with it I have
crossed *your* boundaries
>of etiquette. Nice to know you are interested in
*understanding differing
>opinions*. Except for one little thing...you aren't able
to.
>
>And this too is fairly typical of this NG, to defend BS,
with some pointing
>elsewhere rather than at *the problem*. I am pointing at
this behavior,
>initiated by you, and you are looking at MY FINGER, and
now casting blame
>onto others for your opening position.
>
>(not so) Nice try.
>--
>
>LuckyStrike
>LS@smokedamagedfurniture.youcandriveitawaytoday.com
>----------------------------------------------------------
----------
>
>"Sarah" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message
>news:00df01c3c1bf$6a522af0$a501280a@phx.gbl...
>> LuckyStrike writes:
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >Veronica,
>> >
>> >I have been reading this thread with a degree of
dismay.
>> I am fully in
>> >accord with your evaluation, as well as that of Jan.
You
>> are present in this
>> >NG quite frequently and by now might possibly have seen
>> this childish banter
>> >occurring on a continual and habitual basis.
><snipped>
>> >In conclusion, I'd simply like to state that I for one
>> appreciate the noble
>> >and kind gesture that both you and Jan have made on the
>> OP's behalf.
>> I do
>> >advise however, that it is a complete waste of time
when
>> dealing with such
>> >self -absorbed wise-acres as those that all too
>> commonly "answer" in this
>> >NG. The exceptional and decent persons who dwell here
>> notwithstanding.
>> >
>> >The road here cries out to the adventuresome - **"Good
>> Luck....You'll NEED
>> >IT!"**
>> >
>> >Best regards,
>> >--
>> >
>> >LuckyStrike
>> >LS@smokedamagedfurniture.youcandriveitawaytoday.com
>>
>> I see you have moved the thread from polite
>> differences of opinion to name calling, LuckyStrike. Do
>> you really think that will help folks understand
differing
>> opinions, do you just enjoy venting, or are you
incapable
>> of communicating without resorting to insults?
>
>
>.
>
what
- Next message: Trevor: "Re: W32 Blaster Worm"
- Previous message: David H. Lipman: "Re: virus explanation"
- In reply to: LuckyStrike: "Re: norton anti v"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
