Re: keep getting DCOM intrusions
From: N. Miller (nsm_at_blackhole.aosake.net)
Date: 11/15/03
- Previous message: N. Miller: "Re: Swen.a virus"
- In reply to: Bill Sanderson: "Re: keep getting DCOM intrusions"
- Next in thread: Bill Sanderson: "Re: keep getting DCOM intrusions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 15:23:33 -0800
In article <#1Xz$KaqDHA.2536@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>,
Bill_Sanderson@msn.com.plugh.org says...
> Nah--your description of what a router does is precisely what ICS does--the
> functionality is nearly identical. I don't disagree that a router has
> advantages, but unless it is UPnP compliant, it may also have disadvantages.
The disadvantage of non-compliance with UPnP is minor compared with the
disadvantage of connecting a Windows OS computer directly to the Internet. I
vote for the router solution; it is simpler than creating a *nix firewall.
-- Norman ~Win dain a lotica, En vai tu ri, Si lo ta ~Fin dein a loluca, En dragu a sei lain ~Vi fa-ru les shutai am, En riga-lint
- Previous message: N. Miller: "Re: Swen.a virus"
- In reply to: Bill Sanderson: "Re: keep getting DCOM intrusions"
- Next in thread: Bill Sanderson: "Re: keep getting DCOM intrusions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]