RE: folder virtualisation
- From: jetan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ("Jeffrey Tan[MSFT]")
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 02:12:57 GMT
Hi Ashnah,
It seems that your further TCP issue is not the same one as the first
posted question "Folder Virtualization", yes?
I can not see much problem in your implementation in principle, if the test
also works, you may keep the solution. Thanks.
Best regards,
Jeffrey Tan
Microsoft Online Community Support
==================================================
Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/managednewsgroups/default.aspx#notif
ications.
Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues
where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support
Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow
up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support
professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the
most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations
that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting
Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/support/default.aspx.
==================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
.
- References:
- RE: folder virtualisation
- From: "Jeffrey Tan[MSFT]"
- RE: folder virtualisation
- From: ashnah
- RE: folder virtualisation
- From: "Jeffrey Tan[MSFT]"
- RE: folder virtualisation
- From: ashnah
- RE: folder virtualisation
- Prev by Date: Re: Custom Authentication Package sample code ?
- Next by Date: CAPICOM vs. CryptoAPI
- Previous by thread: RE: folder virtualisation
- Next by thread: RE: folder virtualisation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
