Re: Secure POP3 session using Schannel.
- From: "Tim Ward" <tw2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:28:33 +0100
"Piotr Trojanowski" <PiotrTrojanowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:4AC4EADA-9378-4861-BA8B-026E92A01643@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It's always good to know others are struggling with same issues! Still,why
does it need to be so complicated? These are indeed hundreds of lines ofcode
and I don't want to even think how much time it will take to implement a
complete solution...
.... and that's after you find WebClient.c in the first place (who looks at
the SDK samples these days? why doesn't it come with Visual Studio?) ... and
that's after you discover that the SSL stack in Windows is called Schannel,
searching for "SSL" doesn't show up very much does it ...
--
Tim Ward
Brett Ward Limited - www.brettward.co.uk
.
- References:
- Re: Secure POP3 session using Schannel.
- From: Tim Ward
- Re: Secure POP3 session using Schannel.
- Prev by Date: InitializeSecurityContext returns SEC_E_UNSUPPORTED_FUNCTION on XP??
- Next by Date: Server 2003 AD, security context APIs, "operations error" ??
- Previous by thread: Re: Secure POP3 session using Schannel.
- Next by thread: InitializeSecurityContext returns SEC_E_UNSUPPORTED_FUNCTION on XP??
- Index(es):