RE: Questions about AcceptSecurityContext (Schannel)
- From: jetan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ("Jeffrey Tan[MSFT]")
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 03:27:47 GMT
Hi Roy,
Sorry for letting you wait.
Based on the conversation with the product team, I get some clarify
regarding this issue:
1. This is doc issue, the description should be something like this: "the
output value of ptsTimeStamp may only be relied on when the return value is
SEC_E_OK".
Once AcceptSecurityContext (called with a NULL ptsTimeStamp as MSDN
indicates) returns SEC_E_OK, that means the security context received from
the client was accepted. It shouldn't be called again anymore.
I will notify the MSDN documentation team regarding this.
2. This means for Win2k / NT and downlevel, even if you specify something,
this parameter is not used. So you will not get the expiration time.
Hope this helps!
Best regards,
Jeffrey Tan
Microsoft Online Community Support
==================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
==================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Questions about AcceptSecurityContext (Schannel)
- From: Roy Chastain
- Re: Questions about AcceptSecurityContext (Schannel)
- References:
- Questions about AcceptSecurityContext (Schannel)
- From: Roy Chastain
- Questions about AcceptSecurityContext (Schannel)
- Prev by Date: Re: Where is CryptExportPKCS8Ex() ?
- Next by Date: RE: How to install and test custom CSP
- Previous by thread: RE: Questions about AcceptSecurityContext (Schannel)
- Next by thread: Re: Questions about AcceptSecurityContext (Schannel)
- Index(es):