Re: Crypto API using RC2 instead of RC4?
From: Matt (mtaylor_at_gladstonemrm.com)
Date: 11/24/05
- Previous message: Sami J. Lehtinen: "Re: User account management and information functions usage with trusted domains"
- In reply to: Valery Pryamikov: "Re: Crypto API using RC2 instead of RC4?"
- Next in thread: Valery Pryamikov: "Re: Crypto API using RC2 instead of RC4?"
- Reply: Valery Pryamikov: "Re: Crypto API using RC2 instead of RC4?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 24 Nov 2005 01:40:37 -0800
Ok, thanks Valery.
I shall digest what you've written.
You might be right about the use of srings to store the data being a
problem.
The original KB code used files so I adapted it to use strings as I
want to use the encrypted data in some XML I'm sending to the .Net
application.
Thanks,
Matt
- Previous message: Sami J. Lehtinen: "Re: User account management and information functions usage with trusted domains"
- In reply to: Valery Pryamikov: "Re: Crypto API using RC2 instead of RC4?"
- Next in thread: Valery Pryamikov: "Re: Crypto API using RC2 instead of RC4?"
- Reply: Valery Pryamikov: "Re: Crypto API using RC2 instead of RC4?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|