Re: Basic security question
From: Rob Bolton (_nospam_at__nospam.com)
Date: 06/19/04
- Previous message: Ivan Brugiolo [MSFT]: "Re: Basic security question"
- In reply to: Ivan Brugiolo [MSFT]: "Re: Basic security question"
- Next in thread: Ivan Brugiolo [MSFT]: "Re: Basic security question"
- Reply: Ivan Brugiolo [MSFT]: "Re: Basic security question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:11:27 -0400
> This seems the case of the "net use \\MachineName\IPC$" first before
> using the remote resource if the RPC transport if over named pipe,
> and if the current SubjectContext does not have a suitable security
context
> to negotiate authentication with the remote server.
>
> "Programming Windows Security" form Keith Brown is good book.
Thanks for the info. I will likely get this book having seen good reviews
about it in the past. As for "net use \\MachineName\IPC$", this is what I
mean when I say remote security is "murky". There's no reference to this
under "RegConnectRegistry()" in the API nor any other reference to
"WNetAddConnection2()", etc. Things just fail and you're left trying to
figure out why (a painful and often fruitless process). Other issues are
also problematic, like trying to use WMI against a Win2003 Server machine. I
can't get past access denied errors that shouldn't be happening based on my
understanding of the issues. My investigation has led me to believe it may
be a firewall issue under Win2003 Server since it apparently has its own
native firewall that's on by default (blocking the WMI-based COM calls). If
so then a hole must be poked in the blocking port (haven't tested this yet)
but a commercial application can't force its users to do this (nor tell them
that in order to use the app, they must resort to a technically challenging
operation that most users won't even undestand). In any case, security is a
deep subject and these remote issues in particular are poorly documented. As
a 20+ year C/C++ developer on Microsoft platforms, I'm hardly a novice
either. Thanks again for the feedback.
- Previous message: Ivan Brugiolo [MSFT]: "Re: Basic security question"
- In reply to: Ivan Brugiolo [MSFT]: "Re: Basic security question"
- Next in thread: Ivan Brugiolo [MSFT]: "Re: Basic security question"
- Reply: Ivan Brugiolo [MSFT]: "Re: Basic security question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|