Re: HTTP Version (1.0 vs 1.1) and HTTPS
From: Alun Jones [MS MVP] (alun_at_texis.invalid)
Date: 03/29/04
- Next message: Alun Jones [MS MVP]: "Re: SChannel context & HTTPS requests"
- Previous message: Ohaya: "Re: Problem with IIS5 - "expired" CRLs not working?"
- In reply to: Matt Fausey: "HTTP Version (1.0 vs 1.1) and HTTPS"
- Next in thread: Matt Fausey: "Re: HTTP Version (1.0 vs 1.1) and HTTPS"
- Reply: Matt Fausey: "Re: HTTP Version (1.0 vs 1.1) and HTTPS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:33:39 GMT
In article <oPX9c.4692$yN6.2730@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>, "Matt
Fausey" <fausey@earthlink.net> wrote:
>I cannot find it documented anywhere, but whenever I send an HTTPS request
>where
>the HTTP version is "1.1" the server (any server) responds with a "BAD
>REQUEST" response.
>If I change it to "1.0", it works OK. Is this a requirement for it to be
>1.0?
More likely is that you've used a 1.0-only header, or failed to use a
1.1-mandated header. Does it still fail if you request the same thing
without SSL?
Alun.
~~~~
[Please don't email posters, if a Usenet response is appropriate.]
-- Texas Imperial Software | Find us at http://www.wftpd.com or email 1602 Harvest Moon Place | alun@texis.com. Cedar Park TX 78613-1419 | WFTPD, WFTPD Pro are Windows FTP servers. Fax/Voice +1(512)258-9858 | Try our NEW client software, WFTPD Explorer.
- Next message: Alun Jones [MS MVP]: "Re: SChannel context & HTTPS requests"
- Previous message: Ohaya: "Re: Problem with IIS5 - "expired" CRLs not working?"
- In reply to: Matt Fausey: "HTTP Version (1.0 vs 1.1) and HTTPS"
- Next in thread: Matt Fausey: "Re: HTTP Version (1.0 vs 1.1) and HTTPS"
- Reply: Matt Fausey: "Re: HTTP Version (1.0 vs 1.1) and HTTPS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|