Re: Usage of CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT with Smart Cards
From: Eric Perlin [MS] (ericperl_at_microsoft.com)
Date: 09/27/03
- Next message: Eric Perlin [MS]: "Re: Help with CTRL+ALT+DEL"
- Previous message: Ivan Brugiolo [MSFT]: "Re: RpcImpersonateClient"
- In reply to: Milton Kuo: "Usage of CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT with Smart Cards"
- Next in thread: Milton Kuo: "Re: Usage of CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT with Smart Cards"
- Reply: Milton Kuo: "Re: Usage of CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT with Smart Cards"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 17:40:23 -0700
Flags for SC CSPs sometimes have a different meaning than for software CSPs,
as outlined in
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnscard/html/smartcardcspcook.asp
-- Eric Perlin [MS] This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. --- "Milton Kuo" <milton.kuo@microsoft.com> wrote in message news:#ZxQQFFhDHA.1672@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > There is a discrepancy between the Platform SDK and the CSPDK in how > CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT is used in calls to CryptAcquireContext. Specifically, > the PSDK states that pszContainer must be NULL if the CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT > flag is set. However, the CSPDK states that pszContainer can be non-NULL if > CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT is set. > > Which of the two documents, if any :), is correct? Also, if the CSPDK is > correct, when can we expect to see the information in the CSPDK merged into > the PSDK? > > Thanks, > Milton > >
- Next message: Eric Perlin [MS]: "Re: Help with CTRL+ALT+DEL"
- Previous message: Ivan Brugiolo [MSFT]: "Re: RpcImpersonateClient"
- In reply to: Milton Kuo: "Usage of CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT with Smart Cards"
- Next in thread: Milton Kuo: "Re: Usage of CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT with Smart Cards"
- Reply: Milton Kuo: "Re: Usage of CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT with Smart Cards"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]