Re: Supressing Public ASP Error Codes
- From: "Daniel Crichton" <msnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:10:16 +0100
Jody wrote on Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:31:01 -0700:
The error I mentioned in my example below was not occuring on a seperate
"error Page'. The error text was added to the existing webiste page at
the bottom as the page with the script error did finally display.
Also would an "ASP 0113" error be considered a 500-100 error? Just
wondering ig the leading zero makes this diffrent or not.
Listen to Ken, he knows what he's talking about. I've got a 500-100.asp page
on my site that shows internal users the complete error message and
additional debugging info, and the general public a simple "an error has
occurred" message. I can't remember where I got the original code I
modified, but the MS Support site is a good place to start.
Dan
.
- References:
- Re: Supressing Public ASP Error Codes
- From: Ken Schaefer
- Re: Supressing Public ASP Error Codes
- From: Jody
- Re: Supressing Public ASP Error Codes
- From: Ken Schaefer
- Re: Supressing Public ASP Error Codes
- From: Jody
- Re: Supressing Public ASP Error Codes
- Prev by Date: Re: Flaw in default permissions
- Next by Date: Re: Getting Ip address of the actual client
- Previous by thread: Re: Supressing Public ASP Error Codes
- Next by thread: Re: Supressing Public ASP Error Codes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|