Re: Basic authentication against automated attacks
- From: "Bulent" <bulent@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Feb 2006 20:10:31 -0800
Ken,
Thank you for your quick response.
I assume that a much greater number of components would be involved
"after" the authentication process. If this assumption is correct, is
it fair to say that basic authentication (with SSL) would minimise the
risk of such attacks (buffer overflow) being successful.
Thanks again,
Bulent
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Basic authentication against automated attacks
- From: Ken Schaefer
- Re: Basic authentication against automated attacks
- References:
- Basic authentication against automated attacks
- From: Bulent
- Re: Basic authentication against automated attacks
- From: Ken Schaefer
- Basic authentication against automated attacks
- Prev by Date: Re: keep IIS in RAM
- Next by Date: Re: Basic authentication against automated attacks
- Previous by thread: Re: Basic authentication against automated attacks
- Next by thread: Re: Basic authentication against automated attacks
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|