Re: userPrincipalName with IIS security?
From: David Wang [Msft] (someone_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 09/17/05
- Previous message: Sparky Polastri: "Re: IIS SSL Site Page Not Found - have tried everything"
- In reply to: Dave Williams: "userPrincipalName with IIS security?"
- Next in thread: Dave Williams: "Re: userPrincipalName with IIS security?"
- Reply: Dave Williams: "Re: userPrincipalName with IIS security?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 04:16:00 -0700
No such configuration on IIS exists for your theory.
My guess is that you have some DENY ACL against a group that the
Administrator is in but NOT against the group the normal user is in.
Remember, giving access is not about just having permission; it is also
about not being denied permission.
-- //David IIS http://blogs.msdn.com/David.Wang This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. // "Dave Williams" <davewilliams29@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:%236EUc9quFHA.3152@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Hi all, I have an odd issue... I have an IIS 6 server (actually running Exchange OWA) and two users, one of whom is allowed full access and the other is denied all access. The denied user is a member of domains admins and exchange admins, and can log onto a mailbox fine using Outlook but not with OWA, the allowed user is just a normal domain user but can access their mailbox in OWA no problem. Looking through the AD properties of the two users, I found the only distinction (apart from one being more administrative) is that the allowed user has a 'userPrincipalName' set whereas the failing user doesn't. Is there any configuration setting that might be in force on IIS that might cause this to happen? I'm aware that userPrincipalName is used for Kerberos authentication, but not sure what happens if a user doesn't have one (I've done the same thing in other environments for users without a userPrincipalName many times). Could it be that the IIS/OWA configuration is disallowing NTLM as its 'integrated' authentication method, so forcing Kerberos and that's failing? I've looked around the other configuration options, and can see nothing that would explain why one user would connect and the other be refused. Any ideas? Thanks, Dave
- Previous message: Sparky Polastri: "Re: IIS SSL Site Page Not Found - have tried everything"
- In reply to: Dave Williams: "userPrincipalName with IIS security?"
- Next in thread: Dave Williams: "Re: userPrincipalName with IIS security?"
- Reply: Dave Williams: "Re: userPrincipalName with IIS security?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|